|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Ziojohnny www.juzaphoto.com/p/Ziojohnny  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Sony A700 Pros: Solid and tropical conditions, excellent ergonomics, not overweight, bright viewfinder, possible various customizations, good IQ, good dynamic range (has his age), with its 12 megapixel digests easily even old analog Minolta lenses to 50 euro, resolute LCD good , excellent operating speed when used with CF on the write / read 40mb / s, good burst, fast and accurate center AF point, stabilizer in the body that does its duty. Cons: Noisy above ISO 1600 but usable up to ISO 3200, no live view, NO fine adjustment AF, side steps AF lenses and not reliable Opinion: To date use the machine with satisfaction, with a software upgrade to version 4 of the ISO 3200 is usable if post products a minimum. The advice for photographing subjects not too fast given the slow pace in general of the af system for all text today is fine if known how to use a minimum, especially its efficient placement of the buttons allow you to adjust each parameter without taking aim. Advantageous for the second-price (about 200/250 Euros). sent on July 24, 2016 |
 | Minolta AF 28-85mm f/3.5-4.5 Pros: Construction, solid, bright, macro function to play, sharpness from 28mm to 50mm, made of true color, good contrastorn Cons: Af not fast, macro function only in manual focus, soft 50mm up even at f8 not much better Opinion: I bought this lens for the price of 30 euro, wanted a cheap and intelligent alternative to the 18 55 3.5 5.6 kit, a brightness level no comparisons to 85mm remains open at F4.5, F4.5 kit is still in the 50mm .. a color rendering level wins again minolta, more and more contrast. Building bomb-proof, metal and glass than tough, pesantuccio so unbalanced a hair my sony a700. On ebay they are found in spades and fattibilissimi prices, excellent alternative to 18 55 kits given greater focal range, and higher brightness. Maybe a long nap on aps c, ff of great standard zoom handyman. sent on June 17, 2016 |
 | Minolta AF 70-210mm f/4 Pros: Construction, minolta classic colors, good sharpness if closed a bit, bright, great bokeh, unbeatable, value unimaginable price. Cons: Weight, flare, chromatic aberration even at f8 if used without a hood; slow and uncertain in difficult conditions AF, AF slow from 150mm up. Opinion: I took my "beercan" 50 euro in perfect condition when you take it in your hand you realize you have a tank, heavy, solid, metal; "Built like a tank" is the most common phrase when he parla.rnA optical layer, if you close one eye on AC correctable in PP becomes very clear already at f5.6 but in my opinion the best sharpness are in the f7,1 ; I use it for portraits and produces a creamy bokeh manner indistinguishable, it depends greatly on the distance between you and the subject and the subject and background. Typical faithful color rendition of the best lenses minolta classic.rn certainly unfit to sports and photos where you need a quick AF tracking because very slow especially in low light and at longer focal lengths. What about for me to buy and try as with hand even the nominal price at which you can find, the same focal length / aperture canikon but also sony are at very different prices. sent on June 17, 2016 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
