|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Gianscatto www.juzaphoto.com/p/Gianscatto  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Canon PowerShot A95 Pros: Rugged construction, quality of photos, manageability Cons: Viewfinder, AA batteries, fuel consumption, controls Opinion: It 'was my first digital camera and use it again in a few "dirty" situation. Within the limits of 5M pixel sensor produces good pictures. The body is scratched. The sensor, however, has a manufacturing defect recognized by Canon so after a few years break. Mine was repaired free of charge from the Canon cs even though he had already six years of his career. I have a bad relationship with the joystick in particular with the flash button that returns me all the time even though I deselected. The viewfinder is very small and does not have clear data overlay, so the liveview is a must. Go with standard AA batteries and their duration with the liveview is rather limited to 100 (approximate figure, I'm going from memory - do not use it for travel to 5 years) shots. sent on November 04, 2013 |
 | Sigma AF 70-300mm f/4-5.6 DG APO Macro Pros: Price, lightness Cons: Sharpness after the 200, slow AF Opinion: It 'was my first telephoto zoom, and I served as a training ship. The sharpness is good until the 200mm gets worse. The af and noisy and slow, the lens hood is pure plastic without the internal fabric of the Canon and in any case was included in confezione.E 'very light, with the 350D I kept it in the neck even while trekking in the mountains without feeling very the weight. Although it is quite dark I used a lot as optical concert with decent results at times. I bought it in 2007 because it was relatively cheap and as long as I tried, if I started today I would spend perhaps a little 'more, and would take the Tamron that time there was not. sent on October 09, 2013 |
 | Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 II Pros: sharpness, brightness, cost, size Cons: plastic construction, noisy and slow AF, MF thin ring and impractical Opinion: I took it because I needed a lens very bright but did not know if I would be fine with a PC, so I picked this light that the lens is cheaper than Canon home. The wedding was an immediate success, the lens does well, is sharp and lumisosa. The small size allowed me to instascarmelo several times a checkin at the airport. Unfortunately, not everything that glitters is gold, and considering the price it is obvious to expect that the construction is excellent and it is really plasticky, almost looks like a toy. The auto focus is not mechanical but ultrasound is so slow and noisy and with moving subjects proved to be quite inaccurate. Given the value for money would highly recommend it, but I personally if I could go back would take his older brother, the f / 1.4 usm .. just for af sent on October 23, 2012 |
 | Canon 350D Pros: small and light, money, good image quality Cons: small and dark viewfinder, LCD screen small, lacks live view, self-timer only 10sec, AF slow, plasticky, some software bugs Opinion: It 's my first and so far only reflex and despite the flaws accompanied me on many adventures and although it is plasticky, in five years it never failed. I like her the compactness and lightness, but his being small has its cons: the screen is too small and you pay too much if you want to preview and also the histogram. The AF is decent but not great. A 1600 ISO shots are a bit 'noisy. The viewfinder is perhaps the part of the machine that the less I like it. Out of production years ago is now only second-hand, but for beginners, considering the price, I think it is a good investment. sent on November 26, 2011 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
