|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Andrea De Regis www.juzaphoto.com/p/AndreaDeRegis  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Canon 2000D Pros: Price, sensor, practicality. Cons: Lack of touch screen. Opinion: I am possessor of a 350d and an 800d. I had the opportunity to use this car for an evening. I found it very similar to my 800d. It is true that the touch screen is missing and the same is fixed, but I found it a great machine to start with, practical and relatively inexpensive. In short, it seems a good price/quality compromise. sent on September 05, 2018 |
 | Tamron SP 17-50mm F/2.8 XR Di II VC LD Pros: Fixed aperture on the entire focal range. Good image quality. Cons: A little heavy. Opinion: I've been with this lens for a few years. I bought it shortly after its release following the advice of a French magazine. Although I already had two transtandards, I was tickled by the possibility of using a 17 mm. That became, on my APS-C, a 28 mm. I never regretted my purchase; Of course it's a little less practical and heavier than the 24-85 I use more often. But, in my opinion, it is very valid, also having the stabilizer. sent on July 21, 2018 |
 | Canon EF 28-90mm f/4-5.6 III Pros: Lightness, practicality. Cons: Plastic bayonet, low light. Opinion: Bought used for a few tens of euros, I thought it was almost a bottle bottom. I'm redoing it instead. I don't find it bad. It is practical and light and of good optical excursion. In short, to use for trips when the weight is a discriminant and, of course, does not serve high brightness. I hope I don't have to change my opinion with time! sent on July 11, 2018 |
 | Canon 800D Pros: Tactile screen; functions. Cons: Some modest uncertainty of focus in difficult light conditions. Opinion: I come from the 350D who has faithfully served me for twelve years. I was favorably impressed by the tactile rear screen and, of course, the quality of the photos. A bit more, though scarcely used by me, is the ability to make movies. I do not understand - frankly - the reason why in the 350D there was the possibility to resume b / n with different filter effects, which I did not find on the 800D. It is true that photos should be treated in b / n in post production (and filming in raw), but the chance to see the photo as it is taken is still important. Especially for me, I find post production a sort of falsification of photography that must be valid from the moment of replay.rn sent on June 14, 2017 |
 | Canon EF 24-85mm f/3.5-4.5 USM Pros: Price, focal range, also useful on FF. Cons: Lacks stabilization. I can not find fault. Opinion: Bought together with the 350D now 10 years ago has become the universal use in place of the 18-55 II. I never noticed the defects reported by others. Hardly wrong focus. Despite his years and the purchase of other optics, in fact continues to be the most used. So I pretty much always used. It 'true that I am not a good photographer, but ... sent on March 17, 2015 |
 | Canon PowerShot SX400 IS Pros: Price, objective, practical. Cons: Lack of Galilean viewfinder. Opinion: January 3 bought by Media World to € 151 for a second machine to bring always below without the clutter of SLR (Canon always, but now elderly) and its obiettivi.rnL'ho still little used (only about 250 photos ) and I'm still studying the copious manual downloaded from the Internet. Apart from the lack of viewfinder that was crucial for me but I would have to rise much in the price, I found it fast, practical and very versatile. Good quality photos. I intend to complete the impressions after a longer experience. sent on January 22, 2015 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
