|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Gianni05 www.juzaphoto.com/p/Gianni05  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Fujifilm X-T2 Pros: management through the various external dials, viewing the result during shooting, speed and focusing accuracy. Cons: poor grip (little protrusion) of the drive and exposure selectors, position of the function keys to be reviewed, quick menu not exploitable, high iso not too satisfactory, battery life, RAF to understand how to manage. Opinion: I own this XT2 recently and I come from a reflex dated so some of my performance judgments could be too optimistic since the comparison can only be done with those of my former Pentax. It is therefore better for me to dwell on defects. I start by saying that the small body for me is a bit 'a handicap but I would still be good if the lenses were 27mm but with other optics (at the moment I have only the 18-55 kit and 23 f2) its compactness ( not the weight) becomes almost useless. The lack of stabilization (which I had in the Pentax body) I think is a pretty bad point for a camera in this range because many Fuji lenses are not provided. For noise at high ISO I still have to understand how it behaves because I got some contrasting results that sometimes disappointed me given my expectations after the readings on the tests and the judgments in the forums. The battery as it is known is of limited duration I think for its compactness combined with the great absorption of the camera. I find that the protrusions of the dials of the seletexhibit and drive are not easy to manage because you have to harness them to move them. The function button Fn1 that close to the shutter button seems to me unusable in a practical way and should be moved and the Q menu I expected very different with the ability to select in the various screens also different options in order to have screens with parameters dedicated to example one to video options one to flash options etc. instead of having to switch between Fn MY and Q menu. I think the quality of the camera body is inferior to my old Pentax, especially the little doors look like the doors of a toy car. I must also criticize the fact that different lenses have the aperture ring with continuous rotation without the possibility of setting the aperture in advance if not looking in the viewfinder or in the display, losing what should be a peculiarity of this camera. At this point one wonders why I took it. A little out of curiosity about the mirrorless, a little bit39; for the retro charm that brings me back to my analog SLRs and a bit, actually more because the mirrorless should not have problems of f / b focus that sometimes made me suffer a lot. For the merits I refer you to those who can compare it having more recent and performing cameras of my old Pentax. sent on March 29, 2018 |
 | Sigma 17-70mm f/2.8-4 DC OS HSM Macro C Pros: Balanced objective in yield and cost. Cons: Maybe a bit heavy. Opinion: Used on a Pentax K10D honestly works with the best results between 35 and 50mm and the f5.6 aperture is the most consistent. Also good from 24 to 70mm Considered the cost you can not expect a 2.8 on the whole range even if on the 70mm that in apsc correspond to 105mm in ff 2.8 would be more useful for the portraits. 17mm at All Opening has an excessive vignetting and a chromatic aberration always with the 17mm going from TA to 5.6 sent on June 29, 2017 |
 | Pentax SMC DA 50mm f/1.8 Pros: Low price Cons: Unable to open all-open focus Opinion: Comes enticed by modest cost and good brightness. In practice, I can not use it at All Opening because it fails to matter properly. Working on the front / back focus (inconvenient since it is run by an eastern program where you have to enter and exit in a less practical way) the problem (to a lesser extent) moves to the other openings that being more closed benefit from the Depth Of Field greater. Bad buy but maybe the K10D camera in part could be guilty considering the proper fb / focus adjustments with all the targets though not with such poor results. sent on June 29, 2017 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
