|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Giacomo62 www.juzaphoto.com/p/Giacomo62  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Nikon AF-S 20mm f/1.8 G ED Pros: Sharpness, Usability ( lightness ), Brightness, backlight yield Cons: Lack of tropicalization Opinion: Great wide angle, a real handyman. Thanks to its lightness and usability in all situations (also thanks to the unimer common opening of 1.8) I always take it with me when it comes to taking wide photos: the lightness of the lens takes away the temptation to leave it at home ... In the backlight it leaves me speechless and this really is its best quality: some of my favorite photos were taken with this lens directly with the sun in the frame and the yield hardly suffers... and the sun becomes a beautiful star that enhances the shot. I tried for a few days the legendary Nikon zoom 14- 24 f/ 2.8 G ED of a friend... and I confess that I was not comfortable: it will be that I am used to fixes, it will be the weight but precisely that lens did not convince me: ghost lights, flares, ugly rendering in backlight ... Nothing to do with this nice little gem I own. Try to believe: sharpness and three-dimensionality, color rendering and ease of use make it a versatile and fun lens. Ah well... It is castrated (... It doesn't have the opening ring). But now in the manual you no longer go, in case you play with ISOs ... in my opinion, of course! Conclusion: Nikonist friends if you want a light, fun and practical wide angle for DSLR give us a thought... in my opinion you will not regret it. Good light wide at all ! sent on March 22, 2021 |
 | Nikon AF 16mm f/2.8 D Fisheye Pros: Compact, lightweight (you forget you put it in your pocket...), impeccable construction Cons: If we really want to find one the cap, as already written: but no cons on the lens itself Opinion: Taken used by a photographer friend, from Genoa like me. After two years of use and after seeing the lens yield also on the last photo taken just last week (Spring Air ) I feel the duty to say a few words about this lens. Spectacular sharpness (to close a little compared to the maximum opening of 2.8) great yield in the backlight compared to other lenses I tried, acceptable flare, natural and impeccable colors. Construction from fear, lens all metal and glass, as Nikon did on the goals of the past ( this is from 1993 ) and despite this light and usable. If you like wide-angle viewing and find it used don't let it get away from you... you will not regret it! sent on March 05, 2021 |
 | Sigma 135mm f/1.8 DG HSM Art Pros: Sharpness, impressive resolve, bokeh, AF Prontissimo, value for money Cons: Weight, difficult to handle when the hood is in the resting position mounted upside down Opinion: Really a great lens, amazing portraits, razor-sharp, wonderful bokeh. AF Lightning to bring home good portraits even when the subject moves. The focal is my favorite for the portrait. I also own the Nikon 135 DC: The comparison is overwhelming in favor of the Sigma for sharpness and bokeh.. Only caveat: Since I don't usually photograph Julia Roberts..;-)) ... Sometimes it can be more useful than the Nikon 135 DC to sweeten closeups.... (in layman's terms... Less pimples in the photo) honest price, no need for micro adjustment for my specimen: concluding... Lens to have absolutely... IMHO of course!!! sent on September 29, 2018 |
 | Sigma 35mm f/1.4 DG HSM Art Pros: Very sharp already at TA, Value for money awful, blurry Cons: The only real need to compensate exposure (on my specimen) Opinion: Wonderful optics, bought 2 years ago: after reading the comments about the quality controls probably not excellent and the resulting front / back focus problems ... I had some pathetics. What to say .. they were lucky, my specimen is fantastic, for sharpness and colors: default is the optics that I generally leave on the body, also because I love the large apertures and the resulting bokeh. Rn The weight of the lens is not ridiculous but it's worth it, given the yield ... and yet the overall balance is perfect on the machine. RnrnThe only real problem encountered, at least on my specimen, is the constant overexposure when used in "P" mode: ... nothing dramatic, for charity, just fix the "downstream" problem with exposure compensation, but I understand that it may bother you: I think the problem arises from incorrect reading that the meter Of the car (Nikon) does on a third-party goal.. I'm confident I will recommend it ...: it will give you great satisfaction, with a performance almost from Zeiss (I say it reasonably well: I have the Planar 50 1.4 ...) at a much more honest price ... Really an opt for !! sent on June 26, 2017 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
