|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Paolo555 www.juzaphoto.com/p/Paolo555  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | DJI Mini 2 Pros: Reliable, super portable, charging via USB, RAW, flight duration Cons: To be under 250 g none. Opinion: Purchased in February/March 2021, as a forklift of the MAVIC 2 Pro, it eventually became the main drone for both photos and videos. Of course it is not a Phantom IV or a MAVIC 2 or 3, but the little one defends himself well and qualitatively the RAW, baked by him, are pleasant and rather workable. The video sector is discreet as long as you work in manual and with ND filters (I made several videos with him) Perfect even with wind situations, never doubtful. To be used essentially in VLOS, as per legislation. The only drawback, the use of filters through the system of attachment to the gimbal. sent on September 06, 2022 |
 | Canon EF 8-15mm f/4 L USM Fisheye Pros: Sharpness, good resistance to flare Cons: Perhaps the lack of a protective filter to the lens. Opinion: Skeptical until its purchase, after it tested a Canon Day in Franciacorta in 2014 on APS-H, I decided to buy this Fisheye to have something to use to below 16 mm classic Canon EF 16-35 F4, perhaps give a more creative touch to your photos and to "close" the range of 8 to 105 mm in F4. Initially the use of 8 mm, on FF, I was not impressed, the circular image is is particular, but in my opinion tiresome after a few shots. Different and 'use by 12 mm (approximately) to rise, which is appreciated as very wide angle, especially ideal in particular portraits, sports and why not on the geometry of buildings and landscapes (use this lens for close-up pictures of rally cars in a static position, or the inside of the cockpit of planes or cars). It 'a particular objective, because incentive to look, as noted by others, points of view not convenzionali.rnTecnicamente nothing to say, I think it is an excellent lens:robust, very compact and solid construction! The zoom ring works very well and does not have any type of game, to the validity of the excellent build quality. A TA center is crystal clear and the angles are more than acceptable. Closing the image quality improves across the frame, giving the images very sharp and contrasted. Good, in my opinion, the resistance to flare, while for chromatic aberration turns out to be, always, in my opinion, very minimal and therefore easily eliminated through the software; good resistance to flare. Autofocus very precise. rn sent on July 13, 2015 |
 | Canon EF 16-35mm f/4L IS USM Pros: Sharpness in the first place, color and contrast, stabilizer, filter diameter Cons: At the moment no detected Opinion: I replaced the Canon EF 16-35 F2.8 II with this lens, driven primarily by several reviews, mostly 'positive, and the ability to use filters with a diameter of 77 mm (all my ND filters are of this size ). Initially skeptical, I changed my mind after a few shots especially at F4 with excellent sharpness is at the center than at the edges. Excellent resistance to flare and above all comfortable, free-hand, the use of the stabilizer in times low. In my opinion it 'the 17-40 lens that I still and that I count among the TOP class, it' the 16-35 F2.8 II have a yield similar to this gioeillino mom Canon. Recommended! sent on August 18, 2014 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
