RCE Foto

(i) On JuzaPhoto, please disable adblockers (let's see why!)






Login LogoutJoin JuzaPhoto!
JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.


OK, I confirm


You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept CookiesCustomizeRefuse Cookies



Slambarcin
www.juzaphoto.com/p/Slambarcin



Reviews of cameras, lenses, tripods, heads and other accessories written by Slambarcin


Microsoft Translator  The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator.

panasonic_lumix_fz300Panasonic Lumix FZ300

Pros: Price of the new truly competitive, wide focal excursion, constant f2.8, small size, touchscreen, stabilization, tropicalization, fully articulated display, etc...

Cons: For the segment in which no one is proposed, perhaps the fact that it has only one die.

Opinion: Small and compact, it's really a pleasure to use, even with one hand. Compared to my mirrorless with several Lenses, much more cumbersome, it always gives me a certain serenity: the possibility to grasp details otherwise out of reach, the room itself that gives little in the eye, the practicality of tucking it into a bag, having an object that cost no more than 1000 euros, etc... Of course, the yield does not allow you to print with fluency: in that case the photo must be taken with good light, and ISO not exceeding 400, however it is a purchase that I recommend for a holiday or as a second body. Today at a cost of 360 euros, considering all the advantages it offers such as excellent stabilization, excellent lens, tropicalization, touch display that can be used at the same time with the viewfinder for the point of focus (feature that should be present everywhere) I don't feel like saying anything negative.

sent on November 17, 2019


sigma_sd_quattroSigma SD Quattro

Pros: Remarkable image quality for microcontrast and tonal steps. Clear and essential menu. Mastery of the car after a couple of hours. Double display. Robustness. General approach to photography (induced)

Cons: Sigma SA attack that limits the chances of finding used. It lacks many specific (objective) features. Slow autofocus (only nine points). The size to be mirrorless.

Opinion: After using with pleasure Sigma DP2 and DP0 Quattro, I opted directly for the mirrorless. The system was therefore no surprise. Autofocus objectively slow, but using the manual focus and the hyperfocal you can dare to make street without too much trouble. I bought the machine in kit with the 30 mm f1.4, which is very compact, however the pairing is generous in size and of considerable weight, I dare not imagine it in paired other optics Art series. It is a pity that the availability in the markets of lenses with SA attack close to zero makes it imperative to purchase new lenses and limits very (very) the possibility of trying goals and focals by exchanging them with friends or enthusiasts. Having said that, the feeling that gave me immediately was great, the pleasantness of shooting just as good. I am a user who really uses four functions on the cross of a camera so the essentiality of sd four for me was not a problem. The quality of the shots is really remarkable, the best I have encountered in recent years (with friends I had the opportunity to compare files between Canon 6d Sony a7ii and nikon 7200), although the approach is objectively different: ISO 100, and when the light goes down or or better to store the car in the bag. Great room for landscapes, study and architecture. For professionals it can hardly represent the only machine body, except in exceptional cases.

sent on December 22, 2018


apple_iphone_seApple iPhone SE

Pros: Compact size, great operating flexibility, good multimedia, great autonomy, constant firmware upgrades for at least another year, extensive dedicated accessory

Cons: Small screen writer, front camera below average for price and sales time, synchronization with itunes to move multiple files

Opinion: I say that I'm a chronic undecided of telephony, bought and sold cell phones for two or three years before stopping at this beast: if you're looking for a really compact phone which, however, is as good as performance, from autonomy to multimedia, you have no alternatives . I have tried top 5 "display phones but I find them uncomfortable, 4.7 out of them like the samsung A3 series is a disaster for upgrades (although the software that does not turn them bad) are just fine for everyday operations , and as a media only camera, and the sony compact (I also got the X, the latest model) was bellino, it was very good, but the android has some software-style inconsistency, because of its fragmentation, that a user apple (and I'm more android) noticed with disappointment, then the camera was just good despite the good sensor, cause software.rnInsomma with this jewel you will have a technological object that does not cost much but that I still recommend, do it all and It 's OK, just the new%3Loss of a file manager and the impossibility of connecting it to a usb or pc on the fly for file exchange

sent on September 28, 2017




 ^

JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.

Mobile Version - juza.ea@gmail.com - Terms of use and Privacy - Cookie Preferences - P. IVA 01501900334 - REA 167997- PEC juzaphoto@pec.it

May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me