|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Marakid www.juzaphoto.com/p/Marakid  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Nikon D70 Pros: Lightweight, full-function, strength and durability, internal AF motor, eternal battery synchro flash at 1/500 Cons: Noise from ISO 800 up, JPEG made in difficult conditions Opinion: 6 # 39; last time you charged the battery, if you do not use the flash.rnScatta to 3fps; low by today's standards and probably Nikon could have already then do meglio.rnI JPEG, light conditions "difficult" such as at sunset, suffer from a WB tends to be fooled. Compared to a car today, you will find yourself much more often from RAW.rnLa resolution is one that is: if you are not pixel peeper, and if you need to crop heavily, is more than sufficient, and the files are leggerissimi.rnrnHo took many of My best photos with this machine and sometimes, when I know Scatterò with the sun and want to be light, the use even with satisfaction ... the first love you never forget ... sent on August 20, 2015 |
 | Tamron SP 90mm f/2.8 Di Macro Pros: Great price, sharpness, blur, recessed front lens. Cons: AF slow Opinion: Despite the modesty of my optical park, I know that when I want to make a memorable photo I have to mount the Tamron.rnrnIl bokeh is great; respecting all the trappings of macro photography has exceptional clarity, or at least able to easily exceed 16MP my D7000.rnFantastico also for portraits for the aforementioned bokeh and PDC scarsa.rnCosto down this categoria.rnLente front deeply recessed; not dirty ever and is well protected from flare.rnrnMi join the chorus "AF slow" even if the version I have is that no internal AF motor; moreover, would you use this light to follow a bird in flight ?? sent on August 20, 2015 |
 | Nikon AF-S DX 35mm f/1.8 G Pros: Weight, luminositàrn Cons: Chromatic aberrations at the widest apertures, construction Opinion: Apart from that reported in the pros and cons, of which the "pros" are almost discounted for a lens of this type, the "against" the construction is related to the feeling very "plasticky" which offers, and focus ring minuscola.rnrnInoltre fire: but it costs so much effort to put a little window with a rough indication of the distance of at least focus ?? There are conditions in which it is useful ... but it seems that Nikon reserves this value only to the optics from 1K up sent on August 20, 2015 |
 | Nikon AF-S DX 18-70mm f/3.5-4.5 G ED Pros: Robust. It indicates the distance of focus. Attack metal. Fast AF Cons: Vignetting really strong. Lack VR. Distortion at low focal. Zoom ring uncomfortable. Opinion: I own the objective for almost 10 years, that is since I bought it in a kit with the D70.rnIl most obvious flaw that I can mention is the vignetting, very visible and annoying when you work in "fully open" .rnInoltre the zoom ring is hard and focal slightly 'tablets; It is uncomfortable when you have to make the shot as it tends to "snap" between focal very diverse.rnrnPer else does his hog work; I never tried the other 18-xx of Nikon; what they all say, this has its build quality. Personally I brought in water (not under, but still at the level of salt spray), in Lapland to -25, in the deserts of California to +45 and I also fell. I did not consider myself a piega.rnrnLo sharp, but usually when I mount this is to picture where we hardly boundary conditions are challenging. A 18 distortion, however correct by newer bodies, is well visibile.rnrn sent on August 20, 2015 |
 | Samyang 8mm f/3.5 UMC Fish-eye CS II Pros: Funny, very sharp from 5.6 up, distortion very special, lightweight Cons: Crolla f / 3.5, construction Opinion: Objective fun to use, characterized by a very unusual perspective. I did not think at all that I would have used so tanto.rnDa f / 5.6 up, used with a minimum of precautions, has a sharpness eccezionale.rnCito "construction" as at least in the case of the copy in my possession, on which the ring They are stamped apertures and the notch which indicates the focus bale freely. Exemplary defective, but amen.rnrnCome mentioned by others, the autofocus is used here not really a bat and did not feel the mancanza.rnrnIn final lens performance at or above the more famous fisheye to a minimum price. Must try ... there falls in love as soon as you realize how many allows you to take creative photos. sent on August 20, 2015 |
 | Sigma AF 70-300mm f/4-5.6 DG APO Macro Pros: Versatility, macro mode, price, construction Cons: Slow autofocus (version without motor, mine), soft to 300mm Opinion: Sometimes I say "take a long zoom serious" and then always portrayed as I have fun with quest'ottica.rnLa macro mode, which actually goes up to 1: 2 on a 300 mm allows the shots really interesting. .. all while maintaining a perspective that is also mounted a tele! RNE 'all plastic, but I appreciate the right hardness of the rings, more ergonomic than many other more noble goals, and the fact is not absolutely obvious on Nikkor to have such distance focusing stamped on barilotto.rnrnCon the same lens can do shots from a distance or detail, using the focal; portraits fabulous (9 blades, 300mm@5.6), and macro not 1: 1 but with the advantage of working in more than 90 cm from the subject. Not bad for a small object that MMT can be purchased at 80 EUR! RnrnI against you see when you go to look in detail at 300 mm length ... this is quite soft to make the lack of detail visible without magnification particolarmente pushed. And 'indeed quite common in this price range - let's talk about one of the objectives absolutely the cheapest on the market! For example, I see it when I try to use it to photograph birds from far away ... Despite the focus in theory would allow it, you can not get results, particularly incoraggianti.rnrnReputo AF slow, I state that I have a version antediluvian no AF motor in board (based on that of the body, if you have one) .rnrnIn ultimately hilarious perspective, a must for the novice as it introduces to the world macro without going too pushed on. Shows its limits in those genres in which a major expense is a must; I doubt that his peers money to compete. sent on August 20, 2015 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
