|
Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Paolo Lazzarini www.juzaphoto.com/p/PaoloLazzarini ![]() |
![]() | Yashica ML 50mm f/1.9 Pros: remarkable quality. Cons: difficult to use if not used to lenses that are not suitable for digital machines. Opinion: Once you have done your hand with the Vintage, taking into account that some machines have a specific function. I use to put in AV and adjust the time with the compensation, the focusing instead is signaled by my machine. It is a lens with remarkable optical qualities comparable to the old Zeiss. the gradient is very progressive and the perfect saturation and contrast, often the photo does not have to touch it anymore and you can safely avoid using the Raw. mine was already mounted on my old Yashica. I only bought a 17 Euro metal adapter with sensors to communicate with the Canon. useful only to signal the focus but do not detect the diaphragm that the machine to read the light sets "office" to 1.4mm. Conclusions; maybe I could find others in a good state of these goals. sent on January 31, 2018 |
![]() | Yongnuo YN 35mm f/2 Pros: Price and sharpness Cons: Difficult focusing maybe for excessive game saddles. Opinion: I was surprised by the sharpness, the lenses and the pleasant blur. from its best between f 3.5 and f 16. in spite of its construction a little delicate manages to hook even in low light but the focus is not its strong point it works in the range of a few mm. slowing down the operation, especially without a tripod, there may be some problems. The lens hood is not included but the Canon one is perfect for 50 mm. ES 62. It is a very useful focal point on Aps-c. and you can make great pictures in all conditions, especially recommended for amateurs and students. For more professional use where reliability and speed also matters, it is better to rely on a more "performing" one. sent on January 31, 2018 |
![]() | Canon PowerShot SX710 HS Pros: out of production so it costs little but still very current, to be a small format is quite sharp and with relatively little noise, other similar machines have more sensitivity but then the automatic reduction of noise "Acquerellano" the photo. Cons: Of course, if you push it to the maximum of the focal point especially if it is dark the photo will not be a great deal but you should still be able to do something. Even for wi-fi I can not use it because I do not yet have devices that support it. My fault I don't want to modernize ;) Opinion: It has many useful and interesting functions. Compared to the similar previous Canon that I used seems improved in many places. As if you put a wrong setting es 400" but it's dark then it reduces the speed automatically, or if you zoom with a slow time, it increases the shooting speed. Isos hold much better than before but if you reduce pixels maybe it does better. The jpeg format is quite clear but you can customize it as in SLRs. The burst shot is very fast but you would also need a fairly high-performance board otherwise it takes a while to memorize and get back up and running, even the focus is improved even if we are far from the SLRs. It is very handy, intuitive and robust, even below zero and does not freeze due to the cold. I bought it mainly to post it on the bike to seize the moment, I must admit it does its duty! sent on January 21, 2017 |
![]() | Canon 600D Pros: Lightness, useful door, ease of use accessories and objectives affordable price, I must say also very robust. Cons: At high ISO does not satisfy me much but I do not see big improvements in the new machines of the same category. Viewfinder unfortunately you adapt quickly decentralizing the shot. It would take a fixed display. The flurry 3.7 is not the best, and with the rain because it is not logically tarnish tropic ... Opinion: I appreciate the natural color reproduction, the convenience and simplicity of the controls that did not induce in unnecessary distractions. Sometimes I exposed to major risks; over cliffs and waterfalls, with a self-timer and screen oriented towards me, bolted to a simple stick. The port in the backpack, even bikes and motorcycles. I think in the future I will stay in the APS-c because I appreciate his useful "crop factor" with a more powerful model, but I will keep it as the second most useful body to watch sporting events and popular that I like a lot without losing time to change the objectives. sent on March 23, 2015 |
May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me