Reviews written by Umberto.marcenaro

JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.

OK, I confirm

You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept Cookies

Customize

Refuse Cookies

Umberto.marcenaro
www.juzaphoto.com/p/Umberto.marcenaro

PROFILE

ALL PHOTOS

GALLERIES

Reviews of cameras, lenses, tripods, heads and other accessories written by Umberto.marcenaro

The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator.

Olympus 50mm f/1.8 OM F.Zuiko

Pros: Blur, sharpen, contrasto.rnPeso, size, quality costruttiva.rnPrezzo.

Cons: F stop without intermediate shots.

Opinion: It is the lens where it all began about 20 years ago. I do not see, however, with the eyes of affection because with that objectivity: in its price range there is nothing better, neither in terms of overall image quality, or to costruttiva.rnCi quality can be slow with a blurred even more special, the most effective anti-reflection coatings, crispest, greater plasticity and improved design quality. But you will not find one that has all the features listed without lacking in any area. RNLA color rendering is optimized for film: Before you turn up your nose past files for acr and eye to the white balance: it is still the optics that do not communicate with machines moderne.rnSu aps works fine but loses a bit 'of its three-dimensionality.

sent on January 17, 2017

Canon 350D

Pros: It consumes sensor state of the art for the time. Digic processor 2. Compactness. battery life. Extra monochrome dispaly.

Cons: Poor ergonomics, vibration-return mirror, viewfinder, and the small blind, the small screen.

Opinion: My first digital SLR, the time was an epiphany. The still I keep as a souvenir. It represents the historical moment when the dSLR can provide guess quality became accessible to the general pubblico.rnPriva of frills and nonsense but not what you need realmente.rnLa I would also recommend to a beginner wise and all those who approach to digital wisely (or coming from analogue). Watch out for those who have big hands: better to aim to 30d that does not cost that much more expensive.

sent on December 24, 2016

Canon 1Ds

Pros: Autofocus, viewfinder, ergonomics, construction, color management and sound naive but very similar to the film.

Cons: Small screen, weight and size.

Opinion: [DISCLAIMER] RNLA my review is subjective, targeting consumers that -as the scrivente- mainly ago reportagernrnÈ sweeping machine. In a loaf of bread it takes a true flagship with an af able to read your mind, an extra luxury viewfinder and an operating sweetness to scream (translated: handheld shooting free to shocking times). The management of noise, dynamic range and color are anachronistic but have a relative efficiency richiamarnla film, and the fact that it makes a ff plasticity at very fulfilling images. I sold it to the weight and bulk, excessive for the use that I do.

sent on December 24, 2016