|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Faromich www.juzaphoto.com/p/Faromich  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | OnePlus One Pros: High performance at low cost. Camera which also produces RAW files in DNG format to 13 megapixels. Cons: For now I found none, except that 5.5 inches is enough, and for some, but not for me, it may be too cumbersome. Opinion: I saw a colleague and I'm loving it. I purchased it without invitation: Tuesdays you can buy on the site https://oneplus.net/it/one. I saw now that the 64 Gb rose to 349 Euro. I three weeks ago I got a 299. I use it on the go, to make up your contacts on the camera. And 'possible to do both on a pendrive, that on a USB disk. In this case need a powered hub with a USB cable, otherwise it is hard to drive the HD.rnPer me, if 5.5 inches do not bother, it's a must. sent on March 27, 2015 |
 | Tamron 16-300mm f/3.5-6.3 Di II VC PZD Macro Pros: Versatility, light weight, wide zoom range, sufficient in almost all conditions, reduced distance focus Cons: Soft edges to the maximum focal species, reduced brightness, chromatic aberrations especially in passages of high contrast and especially at the edges, price. Opinion: I got it yesterday, and I went out to do some shooting by mounting it on a 100D. The first impression was of a set camera / lens light and handy. It 'very comfortable blocking excursion nela 16mm position to prevent unwanted stretching during transport. I went on the pedestrian path along the Tiber that I have in the house, and I made some shots a little 'in all situations: landscapes, portraits, birds (there's my friend Heron that now I also know by name) and close -up. I preferred to try it "on the ground" rather than put me to photograph targets sample. The autofocus seems quite fast and accurate, stabilization seems intervene half seconds after pressing the shutter button halfway. I can not estimate how many stops you can earn, but I took 1/8 second to 50mm focal smoothly. I tried a little 'at all focal lengths, from 16 to 300 mm. The overall impression is that I expected. great versatility, paid for with a compromise on the average quality of the result. Ovviamentand those who buy a lens like this do not plan to use it to take a picture of life, but for some light and walk with the ability to cover a bit 'all needs without having to carry all the equipment. Clearly if I go in the shed or call me for a series of shots in the theater, or a sporting event seriously, I do not go with this lens and even with the 100D. But if I go out with the family and I want to have the possibility of some photos with the possibilities offered by a camera instead of a compact camera, the binomial Tamron 16-300 + Canon 100D is ideal. rnIl most important flaw is the low light, especially considering that it should be mounted on a aps-c, and therefore the use of high ISO becomes more problematic and sometimes requires some "planing" pp. This table is the focal / maximum aperture for this purpose: RNF / 3.5 16mm to 24mm ..... f / 4.0 24mm to 30mm ...... f / 4.5 30mm to 40mm ...... f / 5.0 40mm to 70mm ...... f / 5.6 70mm to 135mm ...... f / 6.3 at 135mm 300mm.rnGli other "defects"are less important, because the softness at the edges is most evident at the 300mm focal next, and usually if it is pushed so "close" the subject is fairly central, and softness afflicts less important parts of the frame. At the center instead, is surprisingly crisp always (always thinking of course that it is a zoom 18,8x). Chromatic aberrations, if any, are corrected well enough in pp.rnUn very positive aspect is the reduced minimum focusing even at 300mm, which allows close up of really interesting and decent quality. rnConclusione: a desirable lens (apart from the price a bit 'higher end) for outputs in freedom, with no claim to perfection, with great versatility, and an acceptable quality in all situations. If used for more specific purposes, it is obviously not the lens adatto.rnrnQui rnhttp: //www.juzaphoto.com/topic2.php? L = en & show = 1 & t = 872 610 # 3680088rnc'è a discussion that provides quauks other information on the lens in questione.rnrnrn sent on May 22, 2014 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
