|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Antonio82ba www.juzaphoto.com/p/Antonio82ba  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Tamron 16-300mm f/3.5-6.3 Di II VC PZD Macro Pros: Zoom range, Cons: Dim, 16mm distorts, true focal length but very much lower than the nominal, if you focus on a short distance. Opinion: Good evening everyone. I state that I am not a professional. I own a Nikon D7000 and Sigma 105 macro HSM. Until two weeks ago I had the Tamron 70-300 and 18-105 vr vc kits. I sold the last two to buy the 16-300. Well at first glance very unhappy: the 70-300 being also for FF was heavy index but also stability and robustness, compared the 16-300 seems like a toy. I immediately noticed a difference on the focal lengths. Let me explain: focusing on infinity, both Tamron return the same image in terms of distance, that approach to 'object in the same way (I hope to be clear) .rnDi negative I noticed that to 300mm focusing on a close subject, it seems to use a much shorter focal length of 300mm, in fact, two days ago I was able to make a direct comparison. I photographed a girl always placed at the same distance from the stand, first with 16-300 then with my old 70-300. The result was that with the 70-300 at 300mm I managed to do a close-up, cut the front and dethe chin; with 16-300 at 300mm I had a lot of space on both the front and under the chin; last test I found that to get closer with the 70-300 as I approached with the 16-300, I had to use a focal length of 170 mm alas. How is this possible ?? rnAmo portraits that occasionally happened to me a close-up but with the new Tamron seems really impossible. What do you recommend? RnHo the opportunity to make Tamron purchased only five days ago. I thought of a nice Tamron 24-70 2.8 or sigma 24-105 f4, but I'm afraid to regret the choice because of reduced focal I'd like wide angle. DI against yet I would have no zoom lens, having at this time only the sigma 105, pro only two goals but I would very valid; with this solution, however, I'll be forced to add a wide angle so that I lose again the convenience of everything to do, when I'm around with famiglia.rnAiutooooooo what do you recommend? sent on March 15, 2015 |
 | Nikon AF-S 50mm f/1.8 G Pros: Lightweight, economical, versatile .... Cons: I do not know yet Opinion: Good afternoon everyone, I'm new to this forum and I also bought a few days ago I 50ino the f.18g. I'm a little disappointed perhaps is defective or maybe io.rnPremetto I use it on nikon d7000 here for equivalent focal length is about 75mm, so as not to take blurry pictures, I always try to use a safety time of 1/100 to Tally, however, that the noise of the 'shutter is too strong, as if scattassi with time short, like 1/30 or slower, also the photos look completely blurry. I noticed this evening with little light. Can you give me some advice? I also read a lot of reviews here where you say that the maf is fast, to me it's really slow, much slower than the 18-105 kit as I have. Will you help me? Thanks to anyone who wanted to contribute. sent on September 15, 2014 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
