|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Federicolobianco www.juzaphoto.com/p/Federicolobianco  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Tamron 24-70mm f/2.8 Di VC USD Pros: Those of previous reviews Cons: Those of previous reviews Opinion: Of plastic rings (both zoom that mf) poor, with time, particularly if you use it for so frequent video, become loose enough to "fall" from the target, forcing you to send him to guarantee each about 2 years if not prima.rnPersonalmente i make a photographic use, socially, as a passionate and my plastics are still in place after 1 year and mezzo.rnSconsigliato for professionisti.rnAltro flaw: a little zoom ring too little fluida.rnPer else excellent lens sent on December 17, 2016 |
 | Yongnuo YN600EX-RT Pros: Identical to the 600 former rt, radio Cons: Selective ring not really very accurate .. Sometimes jumps stop some care must be taken. Opinion: Great flash for that price also view the radio, to be reviewed (in accuracy) the ring selective. Great for the rest. (Missing tropicalization but at that price ..) Combined with a yn e3 RT (100 EUR) allows you to build a system with 1.4 flash money than canon.rnOvviamente recommended for amateurs, professionals who turn to the build quality and reliability of the original (though he never missed a shot) .rnAGGIORNAMENTO: after 6 months I have noticed a slight shift of radius af, zooming to 70mm you notice that it is slightly to the upper right. Asked for replacement. No problem with amazon, replaced .. Appearance new one. sent on May 28, 2015 |
 | Canon EF-S 55-250mm f/4-5.6 IS II Pros: Price, sufficient sharpness and lightness. Cons: Construction plasticky, not USM, focusing in low light situations. Opinion: Good canvas to start with, but improvable contrasts and the engine af.rnAberrazioni present (are corrected in pp) .rnOvviamente gains in sharpness closing "a little" .rnScarso photo sports, nature etc. .. if you are interested to take a tamron 70 -300 ultrasonic (of course the price goes up) .rnBuono for landscapes. Change it when you take a 70-200 L. Useless routes through other homes (eg. Tamron, sigma) .rnrn sent on September 15, 2014 |
 | Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 II Pros: Price, convenience, small filters, weight, excellent value for money, f / 1.8. Cons: Construction plasticky, uncomfortable ring mf, difficulty in focus in low light (with canon 550d), bad hood (not supplied). Opinion: Lens to have in a basic kit for amateur photographers with aps-c.rnA f / 1.8 cartoon already a lot of aps-c let alone on ff. For a better contact 50 to 1.4 or even 1.2. Do not forget the sigma above the new Art series, but eye problems typical of sigma (try to buy) .rnNitidezza low f / 1.8, just use a 2.8. For best results you need to close at least f / 4. The best result at f / 7.rnI edges lose some .. especially diaphragms aperti.rnAberrazioni present (can be corrected with a bit of patience in pp) rnSe are equipped with 18-55 f / 3.5-5.6 subito.rnSe take it you have already bought a standard zoom higher (eg. sigma / tamron 17-50 f / 2.8) do not bother, because who does not will hardly ever use a wider apertures of 2.8 to avoid losing too much sharpness on fotogramma.rnRimane still a 'comfortable and sharp optics to appropriate aperture (what to ask for at this price). sent on September 15, 2014 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
