|
Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Francesco Iafelice www.juzaphoto.com/p/FrancescoIafelice ![]() |
![]() | Sigma 8-16mm f/4.5-5.6 DC HSM Pros: Focal grandalgolare extreme - sharpness - autofocus - internal zoom Cons: dimensions - front cap of unusual size - low light ' Opinion: Objective very versatile - almost the mountains and use it for almost any occasion (not recommended for portraits!). At last, the reflex sensor FF can enjoy a very wide lens angle shooting. The colors are nice and the sharpness remains constant even at the edges of the frame. Personally I have not noticed great loss of quality '(I am an amateur photographer for many years but recently with digital) and maximum aperture. Clearly diaphragm 8 or more 'results seem even more' effect. The front cap and 'overall dimensions and also the objective and' substance. Virtually no go "undetected", but the length does not vary with the zooming which remains inside. For me highly recommended. sent on October 15, 2011 |
![]() | Canon EF 24-105mm f/4 L IS USM Pros: lens with very sharp colors and blurring of "character". Cons: Hood without any problem of flare. Opinion: The use of APSC format (canon 7D) and I'm very excited. Basically I can not remove it (for transition to sigma 8-16) 'cause I always seem to go well for my chances of shooting (landscapes - portraits - photos of Sunday). About the "flare" on the website of Canon is called the 24-105 range from 1 to 1000 UT numbering for this problem. Laboratories should solve the problem without costs. No. Series and 'readable in the rear. sent on October 01, 2011 |
May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me