|
Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Yourmother www.juzaphoto.com/p/Yourmother ![]() |
![]() | Nikon AF 28-200mm f/3.5-5.6G ED IF Pros: Used price, focal excursion, weight, size, FX. Cons: Dark, not sharp, not stabilized. Opinion: Contestualizziamo the whole: "A lens FX of reasonable size, which weighs less than 4 ects, covering from 28 to 200, found used to little more than 100" must necessarily have some defects: it is dark, not stabilized and does not break the hair. If you can live with these limits you will have a whole lens do with a great value for money, from reasonable performance. sent on July 10, 2018 |
![]() | Nikon AF 70-210mm f/4 Pros: Excellent yield, lightness, materials, constant f / 4. Cons: Dust, lack of stabilization, rotating front lens, screwdriver. Opinion: I was looking for a zoom for my D7000 and at the price of a 55-200 or a 70-300 (no VR) new I preferred to take this 70-210 used (a lot in my case); I'm sorry for nothing, the feeling is extraordinary.rnIt must be borne in mind that this is a zoom lens of the 80s, among the first (if not the first) AF powered by Nikon, I can say I'm just satisfied with the purchase.rnE 'Extremely compact, does not stretch zooming, weight is reasonable and the materials are of a very good level.' 'The AF is particularly slow if it needs to do great excursions but is reasonable for small adjustments, so I'm not advised about sports but it depends on which. It should be said, however, that with my old D7000 and the current D750 is extremely precise and I think it works with all the various AF modes without problems. The front lens rotates in focus, so no polarizers. Consider the age And construction, it can happen that it has a little dust. RnMake stabilization, but here it's up to youLta.rn As previously mentioned by others, it is a lens to have but it is not easily found. I hold it tight. sent on May 29, 2017 |
May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me