|
Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Strunz www.juzaphoto.com/p/Strunz ![]() |
![]() | Canon EOS M6 Mark II Pros: The very dense sensor, the m/ef ring that allows the use of ef optics, general compactness of the body, good grip, really a very performing miniature SLR, very comfortable screen much more than fully adjustable ones, possibility of crop, files accept important changes in pp Cons: Battery life, obligation to use quality lenses and therefore voluminous and heavy, some small buttons that are activated without wanting, little tightness to other iso and especially if you get the exposure wrong, it has not been understood by the market Opinion: Excellent condensed body of all the strengths and weaknesses of digital, but if you use level lenses you get incredible results, in fact you let yourself be deceived by the small size but in reality it is a reflex, probably even much better, in general I do not appreciate the arrangement of the buttons but it is cmq a subjective thing sent on September 27, 2022 |
![]() | Fujifilm X-E2 Pros: weight - amazing picture quality????? (it's just that I have not understood yet use to bottom) - at high iso is not less than the upper value of Nikon SLR - 10 - 24xf is greater than the amount dx nikkor - good idea of ??the two rings old style SLR even if you go to silt up in a cumbersome software - very low noise and even beautiful to look at Cons: bad software (the Italian version is also loosely translated) - too many customizable buttons - vision in the electronic viewfinder sometimes shocking and not corresponding to the real snap - ridiculous battery life (as if there was the possibility of reflex to always turn off the display ) - the diagram iso car prefers the max iso-rnindispensabile on condition of highlights and shadows with strong intervention acr - the lack of a quick adjustment of ISO is that the choice of the point of focus Opinion: usually use Nikon pro, this would seem a toy that seems to me to produce incredible pictures with the two rnusata xf 10-24 and 55-200 offers a range of images with very high weight and volume very low rnil sensor I think is not comparable to anything in circulation at least at home nikonrni defects seen the high prices are certainly not excusable / justifiable and I will not be overcome, even though in reality it would be enough of a nikon d90 software to realize the convenience and flexibility of use that divides a nice toy to a body performance (I think this might be even bloodthirsty) rnpersonalmante sorry because both the sensor and the two lenses that I have tried are safe qualitàrn sent on July 07, 2014 |
![]() | Nikon D700 Pros: FF - ease of use - excellent battery life especially with mb - sturdy and comfortable to hold in hand - rnben made the software even if a bit too long Cons: the usual faults common to almost all nikon: rnun little weight - if you do not have good targets deludentirn-bit images a loud noise movie - only 1 slot cf - setting auto iso quick little Opinion: real monster in light condition hardly solvable produces results at unexpected times, so much so that many times the confidence in this sensor suffocates the experience, you can let go to "errors" coarse and the result is amazing accepts all targets even the most old even if the best results are obtained with high optical gammarnun little weight and noise shooting are the only defects can not be overcome, sent on June 29, 2014 |
![]() | Nikon D90 Pros: ease of use - excellent battery life - sturdy and comfortable to hold in hand - size is not excessive - well done the software even if a bit too long - reliable travel companion recommended for those who want a robust and convenient to take with reflex itself - very well-functioning car iso Cons: the usual faults common to almost all nikon: weight - strong clicking noise - only 1 slot sd - Opinion: Provides good images even though the date of the project, it also accepts the old targets, excellent performance when used with Pro FX excellent targets for those who want to begin to take a little weight and noise shooting are the only defects can not be overcome, perhaps the images provided I'm a little too soft rnper the rest with a bit of experience you can overcome all sent on June 29, 2014 |
![]() | Nikon D7100 Pros: ease of use - crop further in macchima - sturdy and comfortable to hold in hand - well done the software even if a bit too long - good price compared to the performance Cons: the usual faults common to almost all nikon: rnpeso - loud clicking noise - battery consumption (in my opinion error in the transmission model) - for file processing products it takes a high-end PC Opinion: Monster in every sense, it provides excellent images under all conditions, with engraved images and define objectives ProFx so incredible accepts all targets even older, for those coming from APSC models PLU dated the distance seems abysmal noise with shooting shooting Q is the only defect can not be overcome sent on June 29, 2014 |
![]() | Nikon D200 Pros: ease of use - excellent battery life especially if you use mb - sturdy and comfortable to hold in hand - superior to equal canon - well done the software even if a bit too long Cons: the usual faults common to almost all nikon: weight - if you do not have good targets pictures as compact - noise even at low ISO - loud clicking noise - only 1 slot cf - lacks a good running car iso Opinion: One of the first digital use, provides good images with good targets only good for those who want to begin to take rnper the sensor type and the age of the project is still a very usable body accepts all lenses also older rnil weight and the shot noise are the only shortcomings can not be overcome, the rest with a bit of experience you can overcome all sent on June 29, 2014 |
May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me