|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Bernardinellogiorgio www.juzaphoto.com/p/Bernardinellogiorgio  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Nikon Ai 50mm f/1.8 Pros: Sharpness, brightness, no distortion, bokeh fairytale Cons: lacks autofocus Opinion: Perhaps needless to review an objective of the seventies, but it is so perfect that I feel the need to do so. Already 1.8 sharpness is quite good, but 2.8 becomes perfect. The shades of the colors are rendered perfectly, better than any other goal has tried so far. The same photo taken with this lens rather than another will have a sense of fullness that there will fall in love. I have stolen from my father that he had taken in a kit with an old analog SLR and I can not part with it. Try it and you'll be amazed. Vote 10 ... 10 thousand times. sent on September 09, 2015 |
 | Nikon AF-S 24-120mm f/4 G ED VR Pros: versatility, speed and accuracy of focus Cons: sharpness and distortion at full aperture Opinion: The lens is one of my favorites because of its convenience: for most of the outputs can only take the car with him and take home great shots. However, the sharpness at full aperture is not the best. Compared with 105 at 2.8 sigma, he loses no doubt, but you can not expect the impossible from a handyman. The distortion to 24 is evident, for example is significantly greater than the sigma 12-24 at 24mm, but with the new software system is lightroom type with a click. Vignetting is less intrusive than I expected, but overall I like c'è.rnNel and use it a lot, with the awareness of its limitations. Costs half the 24-70 2.8 and the reasons are unclear, but its 120 mm make it tempting and lead me to give 9 instead of 8. sent on September 09, 2015 |
 | Nikon AF-S 70-300mm f/4.5-5.6 G ED VR Pros: speed focus, zoom range, vr able to compensate for low light Cons: very soft over 200, dim Opinion: A good goal, especially for what it costs and the focal covering. It should be stressed that used 300 lacks a bit 'of clarity. I'll be too picky, or I'll be accustomed too well with the Sigma 105 macro, but here are just a little sharp edges, at least up to f9. The focus is fast and accurate, vignetting 300 (fx) exists, but is resolved in PP. In short, with a view to have and to use up to 200 with satisfaction, pulling at most only in cases of real need. Obviously, compared with the 80-200 or 80-400 seem the worst, but costs half the first and a fifth of a second, so hats off! 8 vote. sent on September 09, 2015 |
 | Sigma 105mm f/2.8 Macro DG OS HSM Pros: Sharpness, value for money, bokeh, brightness Cons: no significant Opinion: It's impressive how the image will be clear already at full aperture. The bokeh is nice, but what I liked most is the color rendering faithful to reality. Often the objectives Nikkor not seem to make more faded colors (fixable flaw in PP without problems), but this does not need it. The photos come from the already almost perfect machine, with bright colors and a wonderful 3D effect. I do not know how to explain why he had problems back focus beyond 90 cm away from the subject, while in the macro function was perfect; in any case, by correcting the defect on the settings of the machine it went all right and I would give it a 10. I love it. sent on September 09, 2015 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
