|
Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Tommasomancini www.juzaphoto.com/p/Tommasomancini ![]() |
![]() | Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 (1987 version) Pros: Sharpness and yield in general, construction, light weight, price Cons: Shortly usable TA, maf noisy, hard to find Opinion: Taken used 100 EUR years ago, is still my favorite lens on FF (especially for street); I also had on APSC, which is much less versatile, yet convenient for notturni.rnCostruzione shots even comparable to fifty plasticky who succeeded him, for both bayonet metal for quality plastic still visibly migliore.rnA TA it is very soft (for me difficult to use), but closed a couple of stops becomes crystal clear shots and returns certainly of superb quality; having tried it, I feel I can say how I prefer it made 50 f / 1.4.rnLa maf is a bit 'noisy, but it's still a lens of 1987 ... and for this reason is not certain with facilità.rn sent on March 27, 2017 |
![]() | Tamron 28-75mm F/2.8 XR Di LD Pros: Price, sharpness, image quality, 2.8 fixed Cons: Maf, building, limping, suffers flare. Opinion: Bought used months ago for a trip, after a fairly intense use, I have to be very satisfied with this lens, especially since it has paid less than 200 euros. Very versatile on FF, it gives great shots and the aperture to 2.8 (widely usable) does not feel the lack of stabilization. It's light and does not bother too much, even when it's full days. Unfortunately, sometimes the mafia is a bit tiring, especially in low light conditions, construction is very plastic, especially the hood that seems to have to break only by mounting it, and the Lock of the focal ring, which I always keep open for fear of breaking it. Also, you have to be very careful about the flare. Finally, for my needs and considering the price, I can not recommend it especially to who, like me, is not a professional and does not feel it deal with much more substantial expenses for a 24 70 f / 2.8. sent on March 27, 2017 |
May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me