|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Dnonp_dnp www.juzaphoto.com/p/Dnonp_dnp  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Lowepro Flipside 400 AW Pros: Build quality, opening on the back, very adaptable, sufficiently compact, built-in rain cover Cons: stitching in critical not adequate, slightly padded shoulder straps for long walks, external attacks useless tripod with tripod of medium size Opinion: After a careful selection of the various products of this price range, I opted for the Lowepro by opening the back: we will close the lap belt and turns having immediately available around the camera kit; when it is on your shoulders, it is extremely difficult that someone try to open it. The interiors are very modular and adaptable to your needs. I can put in my two camera bodies (one with battery grip), 5 lenses (including wide-angle and Shiftable, no telephoto), filters, remote controls, chargers, a small netbook, cables and accessories. The tripod I put it to the side taking advantage of the outside pocket and the strap at the top, or by placing it in the center tripod tends to move too much and becomes uncomfortable when you enter the pocket on the back. I scored against in the 'stitching in critical inadequate': during a photo reportage, came off a seam of the lap belt part (a slight damage, considering the overall weight of all exceeded 13 kg). Despite this, allthe padding is more than sufficient (shoulder straps apart if used for a long period), are present on the lumbar belt of attacks on which I attached a lens case always lowepro (Lens houses 11x14cm) to have filters and / or lenses at hand when work freehand. NOT recommend this backpack if you can afford a higher budget in this case folded on the new Lowepro 450 AW ProTactic, all the advantages of this model more improvements on the pads, accessibility to equipment and versatility. Overall rating: 8 sent on June 29, 2015 |
 | Samyang T-S 24mm f/3.5 ED AS UMC Pros: Quality / price ratio Cons: Record no exif data Opinion: After a year of use, I finally decided to write a review of this objective. Right now the best (and perhaps only) lens Shiftable with the quality / price ratio better (if we talk of used, new is a little expensive). rnrnI advantages that I summarize here: rnrnAl center is very sharp turning a couple of stops. The bill is of good quality, the plastics are very strong and solid. The axes of the tilt and shift are independent of each other (the canon 24mm Series 1 not had them there, and you had to mount the lens in another way by a particular bayonet). Monta filters screw, you can make panoramas without moving the focal plane (see some examples in the shots below) .____ The disadvantages: moving the shift, the sharpness falls dramatically to the edges (but if you make shots mainly d 'architecture hardly comes to use it over the entire length) - the wheels of the blocks of both the tilt that the shift should not be tightened too tight, otherwise stop. NON recordsExif data (I use them to mount any HDR, and that kind of information would serve). I 'a fully manual lens (even with confirmation of focus, it would be extremely useful), I tried to mount a chip of maf, but it is not physically possible. Benefits of using it almost always live view viewfinder because it is very difficult to use in the event of a tilt / shift higher rn sent on March 14, 2015 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
