Reviews written by Simonper

JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.

OK, I confirm

You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept Cookies

Customize

Refuse Cookies

Simonper
www.juzaphoto.com/p/Simonper

PROFILE

ALL PHOTOS

GALLERIES

Reviews of cameras, lenses, tripods, heads and other accessories written by Simonper

The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator.

Canon EF 24-85mm f/3.5-4.5 USM

Pros: Price, focal range, compactness

Cons: Not stabilized, the rest all right

Opinion: I consider this lens more than a cheap compromise, in my view, very good image quality excellent size and the range of focal lengths. Do not use it very much, because I do mainly fauna, however, to use as a handyman in all situations (not when you need a wide angle fixed ...) I consider it a great optics, when compared to the alternatives on the market in the same price range. rnSi is only used, given the cost definitely not too heavy at the economic level your kit; recommended.

sent on January 10, 2015

Sigma 17-35mm f/2.8-4 EX DG HSM

Pros: Price, AF, FF format, costruzione.rn

Cons: Do you suffer from flare, coating Sigma

Opinion: I bought it as a "wide-angle" for APS-H as an alternative to 17/40. I consider it a bell'obbiettivo when you consider that it costs about half of the Canon and how quality and features is very, very similar (after a test between the two). In my opinion for quality / price ratio I see no other better optics for the FF.rnSe '"activities" were not the main landscapes (where spending more is better) I highly recommend it as a generic wide angle on APS-H or FF.

sent on August 30, 2013

Canon EF 300mm f/4.0 L IS USM

Pros: Value for money, macro capabilities, focus, weight / size.

Cons: Honestly, I can not find many, if not a loss (acceptable) of sharpness and speed when used af multiplied.

Opinion: In my opinion an 'exceptional optical, really use it for its maneuverability and its gratifying image quality, also possess the 300 F2, 8 but is many times used the little brother sopprattutto in the mountains or on days where I have a chance to take some macro, in the latter 'field although not a' specific optical I find the 300 f4 a lens from the focus and the quality of 'image used with satisfaction. It is a 'lens that I highly recommend to those who are close to nature photography in general on the ground that can achieve good results on both fauna and macro at a reasonable price and still possessing a' quality optics. As you can tell from my description quest 'optical impressed me a lot and gave me great satisfaction, I could not just deprive even while enjoying the magical Canon 300 f2, 8 is.

sent on July 29, 2012