|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Dianadiana www.juzaphoto.com/p/Dianadiana  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Canon 600D Pros: Weight not eccessivornGhiere buttons and comfortable enough (then goes to personal taste) rnRegolazioni manual exposure etc. on movies and recording full hdrnPrezzo not excessive (especially now there are some good offers in kit also Cons: Noise and grain visible enough already 800 iso (with standard optical it's easy to lose on picture quality, perhaps with more optical 'light noise is more' manageable and workable in post production) rnSi slips easily dust on the mirror focus / plasticky small panel to start the camera) .rnVelocita 'autofocus (for the model is that you can not' pretend quickly excellent but 'if you have on optical base is more' hard to engage rapidly subjects) rn Opinion: A camera suitable to all, simple to use, with features of a entrylevel but higher-end. If not for the construction of interior materials in my opinion very robust and noise issue already in iso average would give even a full 8. In essence, the camera itself is good for just a band of people who are entering the world or refle especially those who do not need a product but too professional to amateur to take pictures during holidays or everyday situations. With optics more 'series or adding external flash can' become a machine already better, offering a higher quality pictures to make shots even a little 'more' professional. sent on January 27, 2015 |
 | Canon EF 40mm f/2.8 STM Pros: lightweight, comfortable, bright, good image quality, quiet Cons: fidelity color reproduction decent but not great, not stabilized Opinion: I own recently but I have no doubt. Definitely better than the 50mm 1.8. The autofocus is quiet and idles trying to engage the subject in precise maggioparte situations, except where it is too dark, (in that case just use it manually in difficult situations). It lends itself very well for portraits having a low aperture so the more background blur. Good minimum distance of focus to be able to bring a little 'more'. Convenient especially outdoors, if we photographed a few moving subject and want to use a particularly short to freeze the action (because it is not stabilized it is important to be able to use very quickly at times to try to get people motivated less possible). With the 18-55 or iris lenses standard in some situations even if there is enough light, we realize that working at maximum times as 1/4000 or higher so the image is still a bit 'dark so sometimes touches raise the ISO and therefore you create a nice little noise on the photo. (Unless you have a camera on the endupper most 'professional where you can work even at very high ISO noise with very low or almost absent). 40, however, since only works well in situations that I mentioned, then maybe you need to do if you picture a bit 'more' professional and accurate you can match a flash or any accessory to better direct the light as reflective panels or other accessories. For anyone who owns it is definitely an excellent purchase as fixed and in my opinion will not stop even after years of stewing, due to its general practicality and versatility. sent on June 20, 2014 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
