Reviews written by Jacksonian1

JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.

OK, I confirm

You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept Cookies

Customize

Refuse Cookies

Jacksonian1
www.juzaphoto.com/p/Jacksonian1

PROFILE

ALL PHOTOS

GALLERIES

Reviews of cameras, lenses, tripods, heads and other accessories written by Jacksonian1

The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator.

Canon EOS RP

Pros: Full Frame, lightness, servo af in videos, adapter ring and complete compatibility with EF-EF-s optics, optical viewfinder with fairly accurate evaluative exposure, discreet versatility of the tilt screen, customizable in the controls , semi-automatic management and automatic even for newbies; in-room crop (x1.6), with the additional grip (EG-E1 ) is handy even for those with a bit of bigger hands; familiar commands and functions for those who have already used an EOS system; HDR full HD video more than enough (for unprofessional use), IBIS for video shooting Connectivity with APP , Eye AF IMPRESSIONANTE !!! , rechargeable with power bank.

Cons: Native optics (RF) still very expensive. Dynamic range (although proportionate to class), battery (already optimized in exchange for a few less features/performance). The standard adapter ring is the "basic" one (there are 3) great if you mix from EF to RF but the advantage of compactness as mirrorless you lose it (even if you mount a pancake) the shutter sound is RIDICOLO , and the silent snap mode is usable only in 1 "scene mode" (perhaps the most serious sin !)

Opinion: The machine has the advantage of being full frame to be proportionate to the market price for perstations and functions has strengths that could even be improved and make it even more enforceable. For example, if it had the silent click that can be selected even in Manual it would increase its value and its versatility as well because, do not tell me anything, but the shutter on a mirrorless for me makes a ridiculous noise... Spend a few euros to buy the grip (EG-E1) that does not bring any advantage from the point of view of autonomy but if you have big hands... you'll have a wandering pinky less than the basic version of the RP in addition to the fact that aesthetically it is cute and ergonomic perfectly complements the design lines of the machine and wanting to find it also colored red or blue in very rare cases ORO. (I got the standard black version) The adapter ring (standard) allows you to mount both optics with EF attachment and EF-S (also third-party but attention to compatibility) is actually the BASE version among 3 available (buybills apart but with a price I do not know if justified and/or proportionate) one of which in addition to the filters "Drop In" allows you to check, with an additional dial, the optics on mentioned completely simulating as if you had the management of an RF optic (in fact it is customizable by the controls for both iso opening and other). While for the coveted "photo" I would not repeat too much of not being too demanding because it re-appears disappointed even working on Raw... (I only throw a spear in favor of Raw if you manage the images with Canon Digital Photo Professional which is the UNICO to properly manage the files. Cr3 ; there is a very little improvement of IMHO management and recovery] unfortunately I over ISO 1000 can not talk about it well... I can imagine that with native optics the situation is better but with EF/EF-S... Forget. Always in the Photo area the most beautiful thing is 'eye AF I was really surprised (already I use Face Detection often but) aim and follow the eye even at a distance impressed me. In the video field instead also considering myself an absolute NEOFITA and "casual user" I got to be positively taken, in the sense that Focus and Drive AF in the videos with the intervention of the IBIS (which has unlike sister R) even I managed to bring something good enough to the house !!! The settings in general are optimized precisely for people who do not have a great experience in Photos/video and I have to say that in addition to the explanations in cam (which I disabled because I seemed to have the toy camera in hand) allows you with a minimum of knowledge of cause to get to bring videos at least Full HD home "there is not so much harm". In fine compatibility (with everything you have of the EOS system to date ) and the lightness of the machine body allow you to carry it with you to have a minimum of decency in the images... If you find it at a not high price (around 1200 euros) it is great to get into Full Frame and already in RF if you do not pass the desire in the meantime and migrate to other.

sent on January 30, 2020

Pros: capacity - data read speed (170 mb/s) - video standard and data supported for Full HD - cheap

Cons: the maximum writing speed is actually 90 mb/s !!! (so minimum speed not ideal for 4K 30p video)

Opinion: I bought this SD, like many, dazzled by the wording 170 MB/S although this data reading speed is more than good (obviously always consider that we always talk about "maximum theoretical speed" but in reality hardly get there) and it would be fine for a general use Perhaps not intensive the sore fact is that the (always theoretical maximum) speed of writing is about half: 90 mb/s therefore not very dissimilar to cards with the lower cost even of the same sandisk... that is X-ray resistant and that is resistant to shocks and water" could go into the background if then for the main use for which one actually buys it and that could make the difference in performance in a room does not actually find it. Definitely not asked for much as price and is in the norm with the SD category SDHC I category but a little extra clarity would avoid more than a wrong purchase for someone who needs something fast...

sent on October 11, 2019

Pros: Reliability - maximum reading speed - ideal for saving bursts of JPEG - standard UDMA7 - standard VPG 65 ideal for 4K video-spinning

Cons: 150 mb/s writing speed - not always the maximum usable speed is actually the one declared (also depends on the device) - still quite expensive -

Opinion: a board whose strength in my opinion is reliability in the sense that I used it for quite a long time and did not lose a shot although and was squeezed well with both high speed of shots (1DX) and high resolution (5DsR) (now it is the schep from 1 in a 5D Mark IV) The few times I noticed "slowdowns" maybe were due more to the now-discharged battery of the room. In fact, with the current SLRs, the capacity of 64 gigs is the minimum from which to start. By now the SD and other media have far exceeded the speed of 160mb/s but until a few years ago they were the TOP really... and they're still in the CF sector. Apart from the price, which I still think a little high , I would recommend it.

sent on October 11, 2019

Canon EF 24mm f/1.4 L II USM

Pros: Quality of images, colors, perception of three-dimensionality of the picture, construction, speed of focus, rnapertura f/1.4, low distortion (almost absent), versatility of use *, rnbuona / excellent resistance to flare and purple fring, how do you balance weight on both APS-C and Full Frame.rnse not have any special needs of the wide-angle zoom and a focal length of 24mm is your idealernquesto is the best you can buy.

Cons: Some say the "price", actually ... rnma according Me is worth every penny speso.rnrnCrea Addiction!

Opinion: In my short experience of photo-lover so I had to try a few different obiettivi.rnProbabilmente like this EF 24mm f/1.4 L II USM have been able to impress me from the first scatto.rnè the lens that I personally use most and that I currently one of the best rnper quality rendered image. It 'also true that on Full Frame actually vineyards to the entire aperturarnma I know that there are people who pay for post-produce and get the same results ... its supposed difetti.rnrnAnzi I have to say that perhaps the same vignetting (obviously post I-producing vanishes completely) RNE one of its most beautiful features along with the defocused (boken) although not his strong point RNE it also very nice, mixing these two "flaws" you really get the picture UNICHE.rnSe then begin to close a little bit (even from f/1.8 or f / 2 seconds me) rnper exploit from f / 4 onwards, as it should be for a wide-angle, things change there is no story ... RNE exaggerated! rnrnSenza go too up with the ISOr you can take pictures even in low luminositàrnmantenendo still a really good yield. rnrnProbabilmente closed to f/5.6 in my opinion reached the peak of quality from the center to the edges dell'immaginernper then maintain excellent levels up to f / 8 rnci are few targets that can be compared to outstanding image quality and color rne almost all often cost the double-speak ... rnrnAlcuni defect in the "focuse" full aperture ... (Back-focus/front-focus) rnsalvo actual (as very few cases) in most cases is due to be released and under what conditions those snaps ... rnforse is because in reality the field of focus becomes so narrow that it is not usual for all photograph ... rnrn

sent on January 26, 2014