|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Batman57 www.juzaphoto.com/p/Batman57  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Canon EOS RP Pros: Small and light, good sensor and excellent file quality, good viewfinder. Cons: Plastic construction, SD door/battery apparently Fragilino, RF Optics range still limited and absurdly expensive, adaptor need to be able to use non-RF optics. Opinion: After selling in 2015 ALL the Canon kit consisting of 1Dx, 5DIII and 8 L optics in favor of Leica and Olympus ML, finally Canon is out with the ML and I wanted to try the less expensive of the 2. The R has magnesium body, but I read that inside it is virtually empty (in fact there must be sensor, battery and circuits, but there are more mirror and pentaprism) and could make it much smaller. The RP is well-wield, it is very logical and rational, excellent the adjustable screen and the viewfinder. Of course, as I wrote, the door of the housing battery and SD seems destined to last a little, even considering that you open/close often, given the low battery life. But with all that space, they could not adopt a more capacent? The adapter ring adds clutter and a 16-35/4L as mine becomes very long once mounted. Last but not least, the RF optics available are still few, but above all inexplicably big, heavy and overpriced! I don't understand what they think about the Canon marketing, probably with 100 million of EF optics around they think people will use those... But the RF optics for features and price are professional, and where should I use them, with the R? I am looking forward to the professional RF of Canon, but that will have to "split", have something more, because brands like Sony, Olympus, Leica and even Panasonic seem to have understood better and before Canon and Nikon where the market goes. sent on May 02, 2019 |
 | Leica TL2 Pros: materials and design, ease of use, amazing optics, intuitive management, although it is the opposite of classic cameras full of buttons and levers. Optical Parks still limited but of Leica quality. Cons: Costly, both the body and the optics, and there are no alternatives if not using adapters and manual MaF. There is no embedded EVF but there is one outside (450 Euro!) But I noticed that I use it very rarely. Opinion: First I was fascinated by the design, then the functionality of the T series. After 3 years of T, I changed it with the TL2 to have more MP and a more powerful autofocus. I also have the external EVF viewfinder, but I noticed I use it very rarely. Astonishing 23/2 and zoom 11-23, but the top is the Elmarit 60 / 2.8 macro: a blade, crazy, suitable for macros, portraits and landscapes, with an unthinkable definition for me coming from FF Canon 1Dx and 5DIII. They say that even the 35 / 1.4 is exceptional ... widescreen and 60th I do everything .... and light travel. The detail care and Leica accessories do the rest, making the use of TL2 very intuitive, easy and allowing you to travel lightly. With 23/2 I have a perfect street camera and a beautiful blur. It costs a lot to be an App-C (1,950 Euros) but you know, Leica costs, but it's all worth it. sent on October 31, 2017 |
 | Leica Q (Typ 116) Pros: Drawn with his head, after asking thousands of photographers what they wanted to have in their ideal camera. FF sensor, superlative optics, gorgeous sensor, all controls in place, beautiful to die, fast. Cons: Costa, but it's Leica and you know. And everyone is worth it. You can not write copyright data in Exif data, but it's just a question of fw. For the rest perhaps tropicalization is missing ... Opinion: After decades of Canon up to 1Dx and 5D3 with various optics L, I decided to change. I did not enjoy the holidays if I was forced to drag me kg of equipment. The Q does everything: the 28mm is similar to the smartphone's perspective, f / 1.7 makes it unique even at night, macro working allows original photos. All in a finally modern, well-studied, beautiful, and durable body. Besides, I've used it sometimes to basketball and it does very well! It's fast as shaken and shaky, MaF is more than enough and holds the 2-3,000 Iso. Finally a multipurpose camera to always carry. In addition to the Q I was forced to buy the T to have a super wide-angle (zoom 11-23) and a portrait and macro canvas, the gorgeous and expensive 60 / 2.8 Macro TL, a glass of unexpected quality. RnLeica understood For years that the reflex would die, with the advent of electronic sighters, and Q's EVF is gorgeous, without lags, delays or skiing. I wonder how Canon and Nikon stayed on the pile to see the merchandiseThat change. Nikon is now overtaken by Sony in the FF industry, Canon risks big ... sent on May 24, 2017 |
 | Leica X1 Pros: Meanwhile it is BEAUTIFUL. Nothing to say, the subject attracted me at first sight for aesthetics and also to the fact that it has an APS-C sensor. In addition has the optical zoom or even FIXED: equivalent to a 36mm Leica, ideal for the street, but also for landscapes, portraits settled, and so on. Has the two classic rings of times and diaphragms, and thanks to the X1 I rediscovered the simplicity of pure photography. Simple menu, small enough if the lens is retracted, manufacturing is well crafted. When I want to enjoy myself mount the optical viewfinder and shutter looking inside, not on the display. The pleasure is remarkable. Then, de gustibus ... I think the fact that the optical zoom gives fixed and even allowed us to optimize the sensor and in fact the quality of the files and images is remarkable. Cons: The objective that comes out when the turn is a bit 'from compact camera, but at least when it is closed the footprint is minimal. It 'a camera tends to SLOW, but this is typical of Leica, especially when compared to modern technological monsters (I have the 1DX .... so to speak ...). The battery does not last long, about 200 shots ... but with the optical viewfinder lasts longer ... It does video, but for me this is a plus .... Opinion: It made me rediscover the pleasure of photography simple, weighted, essential. The design is beautiful, the construction Leica. The fixed lens made me remember to do 2 steps backward or forward to better compose the image. The slowness has reduced employment sectors but I did make peace with the photograph thought. The new version launched in 2012 (X2) only adds 4MP with 12 in X1 and the possibility to mount an electronic viewfinder. I think it is so bad that I consider impossible! Perhaps it makes more sense on the X Vario, which has a zoom .... Today, the X1 is used less than 600 euros, a very attractive price for a camera of these features, Made in Germany. sent on June 25, 2013 |
 | Canon 1DX Pros: Like all 1D, this is a tank and bursting strength only to look at her. The speed is one of its strengths, now combined with the FF sensor and produces files that crazy. The Jpeg seem even better for behavior at high ISO, about processors and the algorithm introduced by Canon on this and on the 5D Mark III. Up to 12,800 ISO files are widely used, a minimum of noise is known, but it is fine and does not bother. I come from 1D3, 1D4 then, 5D2 and 5D3 hours: the 1DX is insanely ahead of all of these, and only the 5D3 moves closer to the speed of MAF, but not burst, exposure and individual behavior at high ISO, where one loses stop with respect to the 1DX. Cons: It 'a tank, so it is bulky and heavy. Pe exploit it properly should definitely read the manual several times and try different settings, or you may not sfuttarne potential. I the first time I used the basket was a little 'disappointed, I did not notice big differences from the 1D4 and 5D3. Then I set up and customized well, especially in AI Servo at high ISO, the results are seen! It does not have the slot for the SD slot but 2 CF: I will use the SD WiFi and there are still bad. Luckily I found on Amazon a CF adapter -> SD law and is compatible with SD WiFi, so shooting in RAW and JPEG files on the CF SD WiFi and these transmit the real-time iPad to send to editors. It would have been better to have CF and SD as the 5D Mark III. Still costs much .... Opinion: A huge leap forward compared to the 1D Mark IV. The sensor FF stands out, is a camera that's complete. To me the 18 MP enough but I'm not sure that Canon will stop here, for those who study or weddings are perhaps 25-30 MP, and despite saying that the Canon 1DX combines the Mark IV and Ds, I think that will come with a 1D sensor exaggerated and maybe not as fast. sent on March 20, 2013 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
