|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Moskiz www.juzaphoto.com/p/Moskiz  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Samsung Galaxy Note 3 Pros: Very large Full HD display (super amoled perfect blacks) that hardly makes you forget a tablet from 7-8 inches, S-pen functions at the top, speed, fluidity, no locking, a Touchwiz working properly, USB3, USB2 compatible connector cables, Knox mode useful for privacy, Camera phablet being a good standard. Cons: Battery life less than the previous NOTES complicated to handle with one hand, but not the only digital optical stabilizer (which should not be too bad all things considered), the display under the sun is not as exceptional as I expected, lack HDR. Opinion: I have since 3 days this Note3, undecided until the last between this and the new LG G3, fortunately they both had them in the store so I could try them on hand at the same time. LG G3 (it was only available 2gb ram and 16gb) has on its side, the stabilizzaore OIS, and the MAF laser qHD display so I decided to give it a try right on the goodness of these aspects, but in the end I did not notice the wonder that makes you cry miracle. The MAF laser is a little bit faster, but maybe 2/10 ", the touch-and-shoot has also Note 3, the stabilizer OIS instead does an excellent job, the qHD display with the naked eye does not offer anything in + FullHD even worse than the duration Battery and performance of the Notes GPU.rnIl 3 has the 3gb ram her, 32GB, 3200mA battery, stylus, screen + ample, both 13mpx and lower price. rnrnIl 3 notes I received production being "cool" had already installed the 4.4.2 and indeed has none of the flaws that someone has encountered upgrading from 4.3 (OT. However, I never tire of saying that unfortunately ogtion time you update the firmware versions on both Android apple that is always advisable to do the factory reset and reinstall the app ... you avoid almost all rognette update of facts "above"). rnrnPer regarding strengths and weaknesses will I refer to the above I have nothing to aggiungere.rn sent on July 01, 2014 |
 | Sigma 70-200mm f/2.8 EX DG HSM Macro II Pros: Very affordable price (found again in the store, do not import, just over 500 €), MAF extremely fast and precise construction and finish good, tripod ring supplied. Cons: Difficult liveview autofocus in low light. Tend to be soft. Opinion: It's my first 70-200 so I can not comment on that yet exhaustive. I noticed that the colors returned are missing a bit 'of saturation and contrast, at least when compared with photos taken with the Nikkor 16-85. Anyway fixable in PP. The MAF impressed me most is that in afc afs, the rings have a Buna precision and smoothness comparable to nikon. In general, the value of the new is remarkable. sent on December 07, 2013 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
