|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Clawild www.juzaphoto.com/p/Clawild  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Sigma 18-125mm f/3.8-5.6 DC OS HSM Pros: Construction quality / price ratio focal length versatility Cons: stabilizer Opinion: I bought this lens recommended by-law that was also used for professional photography services. I got to go to replace the kit lens of my Nikon D40 then and besides making me take a quantum leap forward is still in my photo kit ready to be used in those situations where you do everything a grand angle too little and too much canvas. I appreciated robustness and quality of the lenses despite being a consumer goal. To report the defect to the stabilizer. Both on my own with nikon attack on those of my father in law with canon attack after a given time to use the stabilizer fails and begins to vibrate also going to increase the consumption of the battery of the car. And 'an annoying flaw that once cycled the machine disappears but reappears after a time x. Sent to repair the cost exceeded the new lens price. In summary it was a lens that allowed me to make a leap forward in terms of kit, robust (I own it for 7 years) but withthe possibility that after months / years of use fails stabilizer making the annoying use. rn (NB after about 5 years of repair and not a frequently used order returns the fault to the stabilizer) sent on July 18, 2016 |
 | Nikon D7100 Pros: point autofocus sensor, sharpness, Cons: accoppiargli need a sd card fast otherwise you can not take advantage of the flurry. Opinion: I went from a D90 to D7100 mostly to the most advanced sensor. Compared to the D90 I note management at high ISO better than the D90 (and this is the main reason why I got it). Even if you shoot at ISO 2000 in low light you manage to get a picture richer in detail in post-production. rnInteressante factor CROP drive that allows you to "stretch" my 500mm (it comes down to 18mpx but we must consider that they are still very much) .rnIn final considering the cost and the "technical value" of the machine are satisfied. sent on September 14, 2015 |
 | Sigma 150-500mm f/5-6.3 DG OS HSM Pros: value for money, autofocus, weight balance, stabilizer Cons: zoom ring that rotates in the opposite direction compared to the standard Opinion: I took this lens following the breakup of my carrormato Sigma 135-400mm. Like all sigma, they say, suffers from lack of sharpness at full aperture sincerely believe that a fixed precisini. If you have some mastery of photographic practice and post-processing is possible to obtain photo meravigliose.rnGirando about a hour or so with the aim neck does not feel so much weight, even on the anti-lock excursion that balances well weight. The stabilizer goes very well (if anything, my concern is that it does not suffer from breakage as the stabilizer of the sigma 18-125mm). The autofocus in situations with background not too comlicato (intertwining branches) engages the subject well and quickly. Used in a snow day the lens is not even too dark. I took a 1/400 f8 ISO 800 with good detail of the final foto.rnIn recommend this lens for people photography lover but do not have the budget of the major objectives nikon and canon. Recalling that a good lens will not improve a photo hurt, but uNo bad lens will not ruin a photo done well. sent on November 21, 2013 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
