|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Andrea Vermigli www.juzaphoto.com/p/AndreaVermigli  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | LEE Big Stopper Pros: Everything Cons: Now is a bit 'inflated ... Opinion: What about this filter ... did fashion! Thanks to him many photographers have ventured into long-long exposures, so as to have become a bit 'inflated its effect. Apart from that is well built as well packed. Very useful addition to packaging for transport, the small "package" for the calculation of exposure. In addition to the dominant, easily correctable, it is a glass that requires a lot of attention in cosiderazioni lights / unwanted reflections ... sent on May 26, 2015 |
 | Lee Polarizzatore 105mm (Rotating) Pros: Quality, quality and quality ...! Cons: Cost, cost and cost ...! Opinion: I own this polarizing filter from several time now and I can not help but speak well. There's really not much to say about ... it's a polarizing filter, is quality and it is really expensive. What I would say is that since I have this filter I do not need any more polarizing, because in addition to the traditional use of special system Lee, I use it by hand, simply by placing it on the lens. This is possible thanks to its 105mm diameter making it "universal". Cost overflight ... there is little to do, is in line with the market if we do the proper proportions. sent on May 26, 2015 |
 | Manfrotto 468 Q6 Pros: Materials, locking system, robustness, reliability, simplicity of use. Cons: Clamp and plate ... Opinion: Background: I am a landscape photographer and was looking for a ball head "definitive". rnFra various ball heads on the market I spotted this 468MGQ6 the Manfrotto which I think was the most complete of the ball heads inspected. Complete because first of all it is robust, with great range, made with good materials and well finished, easy to use thanks to the hydrostatic system that more positive effect also on the "games" in the tightening phase (classic and big problem of all heads Ball). Undoubtedly, once owned, I enjoyed everything I have just written in addition to the weight and size is not exaggerated and a more than affordable price when compared to similar products of high-end manufacturers. The only real sore point of this head is the clamp and the plate ... to insist Manfrotto what to say and write: "... The system is also compatible with Q6 plates quick release type Arca and with heads other manufacturers ... "this is not true. In fact if intendiamo use KirK plates, RRS, Wimberley, etc. the whole is not compatible. I did a test with the ark-style plates of Benro always with the same result of incompatibility. Having said that I was forced to change the clamp and I bought one of Wimberley (C-12). Without the replacement operation (really trivial) I solved all my problems and I have in my hands a good ball head! The rating I gave is 7 and is only guilty of Manfrotto 10 ... if not the company produces excellent products but in terms of compatibility with Arca system (which is standard) we just do not ... sent on May 21, 2015 |
 | Nikon SB-700 AF Speedlight Pros: Compact, complete, powerful Cons: None Opinion: Flash quite compact yet powerful and so versatile. Obviously lower than his older brother SB-910 but still defended well especially if compared to the size and price. In addition it is well equipped and the case is comfortable and well finished. Ultimately it is a great flash least you do not have special needs. sent on May 20, 2015 |
 | Nikon AF-S 16-35mm f/4 G ED VR Pros: Fairly light and compact VR if needed, on average, fairly clear, useful focal length range, the possibility of using filters Cons: Distortion, sharpness at the edges fall Opinion: And 'certainly a zoom wide angle Nikon successful, either because of its compact size (neither a feather nor a brick), or for its focal length range, but above all (for those who do landscapes) for the ability to mount filters and polarizing plate. Often you opt for the 16-35 and the 14-24 no right to the use of filters (obviously at the expense of the quality of 14-24). I personally balance I'm happy with this lens, the only really negative note, to my taste, are the angles ... mushy and not very sharp. Let's say that the fall of quality at the edges of the distortion that bothers me most, however, about a little 'all lenses of this type. sent on November 10, 2014 |
 | Manfrotto 055 CX PRO3 Pros: Lightweight and compact enough, decent quality carbon column tilting to 90 °, edited in finishing. Cons: Locking leg sections with lever, screws not durable. Opinion: It 'still the tripod that I use the most and I certainly abused so much in the last 3 years. The system that brings Lanyard central horizontal initially did not thrill me, but then, employing it on several occasions I started to appreciate it. Good lightness and compactness, in my opinion locking leg sections is not the best ... the levers are uncomfortable and, over the years become increasingly difficult. In my humble opinion it is a good product, fairly all-purpose, but definitely not the best for nature photography in general. sent on November 07, 2014 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
