|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Iw7bzn www.juzaphoto.com/p/Iw7bzn  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Canon EOS M3 Pros: size, light weight, portability, quality of the files even at high ISO (consistent with size) Cons: compared to other cameras in the same category lacks some "gadget" both electronic and SW that 'would make it more "palatable" Opinion: Are user of ML since the appearance on the market of the first outputs of the m4 / 3 (EPL-1, etc. etc.) and the old EOS-M, removed the IQ, it was not comparable to the bodies m4 / 3, especially AF, the camera features for tenders and for the completeness of the system, with the 'out of this M3 things have improved a lot, even if, in some ways, it is still a bit away from' the world offering m4 / 3.rnDella old "M" 's really disappointing aspect was L' AF, which now has improved a lot, so much so that in the individual and in light conditions "normal" is almost comparable to the competition (except G7 A6000 and Sony) and It remains significant even with the 'use of EF lenses and EF-s adapted, both with USM lenses that with the STM, nresta little for me, the' AF continuously ...... but not a car to be used in " to-servant ".rnOttimo the tiltable touchscreen, which remains easily readable even with plenty of light, the camera body and tiny tastini concentrated, not ideal for large hands but it is still good the 'ergonomics, although I would have dedicated the wheel of under- and over-exposure to other functions and moved the frets of the registration, which often is pressed accidentally, in a little more posto.rnMenù gaunt and typically Canon, I would not mind a few extra gadgets SW, type the "time lapse", another downside is that all photos taken using the "effects" as HDR photo, watercolor, B / N grainy, etc, etc . are only saved in jpg ... shame, I would have liked also the storage / RAW.rnRispetto of other brand slow the system seems incomplete, but in fact the lens to form a complete equipment are all part of it in fact, from '11 -22 up to the 55-200 with the 'addition of a tiny 22 f2.0, for those who want a 35mm eq. bright, without forgetting that they are also ideal for use as a lens EF 50 f1.8 STM, but also the '85 f1.8, and is still the 135 f2rnIl bodyquestion occupies very little space in your bag and weighs very little and is very useful for my purposes as a second or third body (I have an SLR FF and an SLR aps-c), the photographic yield was a pleasant surprise, very good and unexpected capacity Recovery of the shadows, very good yield at high ISO (for aps-c), razor sharp files especially with the 22 f2.0 and the 55-200 zoom, pleasant colors and tonal passages, very good given on ' incarnato.rnConsigliatarnrn rn rn sent on February 02, 2016 |
 | Canon EF-M 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 IS STM Pros: build quality, well finished and without games, well the ring maf soft and pleasant in 'use, excellent stabilizer, the silent' AF, sharp at all focal lengths beyond expectations Cons: Barrel finishing a little slippery and slightly larger than average, I would not mind "collapsible" Opinion: I come from the world m4 / 3 and this lens I was pleasantly surprised by its sharpness and other aspects that I thought the worst, unfortunately fame running in other brands of lenses kit Canon is not the migliori.rnLa lens kit is the new 24 megapixel EOS-M3, the 'accopiata I really like, I found it very good contrast and micro-contrast, extremely pleasant and natural colors returned nuanced, I noticed no AC, it tantomenno problems blooming in backlighting which also remains good contrasto.rnIl the vote I have given (9) and considerations are not absolutist, but take into account the range and category of membership of the recommended lente.rnMolto sent on April 30, 2015 |
 | Olympus M.Zuiko Digital 14-42mm f/3.5-5.6 EZ Pros: Compact and lightweight finish makes a tutt 'one with the M10 Cons: Zoom ring too close to that of maf, when making zooming if you strike the ring maf activates the 'magnification and you lose the' shot, I would have liked a lower resistance of the zoom ring, no hood Opinion: Rating 6 for clarity and for the rest of the optical performance, valuable to build a very compact system, the machine goes into a pocket, but if you claim some 'quality must choose another, loses much against the 14-42 Panasonic nothing of that modest overall suffer from flare and becomes low in contrast against the light, I expected more from Oly sent on April 17, 2015 |
 | Olympus M.Zuiko Digital 45mm f/1.8 Pros: size and lightweight, excellent lens in scope m4 / 3, if evaluated / compared with other systems you resize a lot, low price and convenient, always remaining within the m4 / 3 ..... the end is a 45 f1.8 and the FF and mopeds of this opening cost less and cover larger sensors Cons: not particularly sharp at TA, suffers from AC, it would not be permissible for a modern lens and designed from scratch, difficult to find and ND filters for use in TA in full sun (blurred) time to 1/4000 is not enough, unfavorable feeling of "plasticosità" in handling Opinion: For a small kit to be attached to a more "authoritative" this lens is a must, small, light, very sharp, good bokeh, I use it together with the two standard zoom 14-42, 40-150 and the fish Samy , and it is my travel kit, everything is in a microborsa audiovideo. Recommended for compact and lightweight systems trasportabilissimi with whom you want to have a good IQ in scope m4 / 3. sent on September 12, 2014 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
