|
Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Frax www.juzaphoto.com/p/Frax ![]() |
![]() | Olympus Zuiko Digital 25mm f/2.8 Pancake Pros: Small, portable, suitable for street art is as focal as that configuration with the M10 or similar in size. Cons: Clearly it lost in sharpness wide open, but always comparing him to higher-end goals and higher cost Opinion: For those who enjoys doing street art or want a fixed lens, small, convenient for trasforare an M10 in a pocket true, then it is the perfect solution! RnLavora very well at both high lights of sera.rnA we f.2,8 a bit of flare, but quietly repaired then I really like as a stimulus to work on inquadrature.rnProvare in post produzione.rnLa fixed focal length (50 mm full frame) is believing! rnrnAh, I find also that the bodies Olympus very well gestiscano the " accommodation "of angles and automatically flare shooting in JPG. I did several tests with images shot in RAW and JPG and I find that with this lens is great shooting in JPG, I find the best result with respect to the post in lightroom sent on January 05, 2017 |
![]() | Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 7-14mm f/2.8 Pro Pros: Opening - Sharpness - Detail - Speed ??- Strength Cons: nobody Opinion: I use it for about a year on both M1 and M10 ... I can only say that at the moment is the best lens I have in mano.Considerato do all that on a micro 4/3 at f4 photographing just about anything .. .devo tell which is the perfect lens and worth every euro.In f 2.8 is exceptional indoors or blurred, and I must say that with the M1 I have no special flare issues sent on January 05, 2017 |
![]() | Olympus 9mm f/8 Fish-Eye Body Cap Pros: Simple to use, effective in the results, really comfortable in the dimensions Cons: Given the price, no one. Opinion: Great for photos "artistic" or ultragrandandolari unpretentious, I use it in sports ambiete to resume across the playing area (eg basketball or soccer) where you do not seek after the greatest detail, but sufficient sharpness to obtain excellent results for the purpose of publications of articles or web cartacei.rnOttimo for street photo for the same reason mentioned sopra.rnrnE 'clear that it can not be compared in invoices and features to PRO series lenses or cmq that cost at least 2/3 times più.rnrnLo advice strongly !!! sent on January 05, 2017 |
![]() | Tamron SP 17-50mm f/2.8 XR Di II LD Pros: Bright, Light, Sharp, Economic, Versatile Cons: Absence of stabilizer Opinion: I try to summarize my pensierio not repeat when called by all-altri.rn1 for the price it is worth 10 points! RN2-is really great for those who want to trash the 18-55 basern3-bright and excellent sharpness! Unfortunately RN4- the absence of the stabilizer in the closed situation forces you to pump up the ISO for not having tight to micromossi times! rnDiciamola all, or you € 800 for CANON (which in my opinion is worth all of them having it) or this is the best alternative NOT that a professional might have. sent on May 19, 2014 |
May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me