|
Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Gavi82 www.juzaphoto.com/p/Gavi82 ![]() |
![]() | Nikon D300s Pros: Body Pro, precision af, ergonomics, right number of pixels, burst, buffer like the top range, Indestructible!! Cons: Noise from 2000 iso .... but pp is resolved Opinion: From the happy owner of a D7000 I decided to buy a second body, my choice was the 300s. It might seem like a downgrade, instead no! This is a car that in spite of the age has only against the estate over the ISO 1600/2000 .... For everything else there's APSC that bears comparison! The number of pixels that are just an excuse for a bad crop of a photograph framed .... With its 12 megapixel can not get results with the 7000 I never got. With the BG ... I get the 8fps exceeded only by the D3S and D4 / s. The 7100 is fast .... but after 6 shots crashes due to buffer ridiculous to say the least, with the 300s arrive safely at 30raw! You can shoot Tiff thing with machines "consumer" 7000/7100 you can not do, this allows you to have files ready to print without going into pp and with a color depth that the jpeg dreams ..... . then ...... The sound of M16 emits the shutter when shooting is something indescribable, not to mention the body entirely inmagnesium alloy with its beautiful extra pounds of weight which makes it a truly professional machine worthy of this name is ..... in short, is a pro machine suitable for a professional photographer who despite 5 years of difference with the 7100 counter only the seal iso ........ The video industry? Well if I wanted to shoot a video camera would buy it? ;) sent on August 01, 2014 |
![]() | Nikon AF-S 70-300mm f/4.5-5.6 G ED VR Pros: "Light", crisp, fast af, impeccable construction, exceptional stabilization (the real 4-stop guaranteed by Nikon) Cons: a bit more brightness would not have failed. Opinion: took only a few days and I must say that I'm really pleased, worth every penny. I come from a 80-200 f2.8 pump and apart from the brightness I have to say I do not regret it at all. I use it mainly for sports photography and the difference with the "Pompon" in terms of AF speed, maneuverability, and why not, sore arms at the end of the day, it should be all in favor of the 70-300.rnrnCONSIGLIATISSIMO! sent on January 28, 2014 |
May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me