|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Fyffo_italiano www.juzaphoto.com/p/Fyffo_italiano  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Nikon AF-S 70-200mm f/4 G ED VR Pros: Sharpness, effective stabilizer, strength, maneuverability, glide rings .... well BEAUTIFUL!! Cons: Price Opinion: Taken from a few days at a great price from the Ollo Store warranty two years and absolutely original packaging and undamaged. Lenses that just melt my heart to look at them they are so clear .... dials and levers of management absolutely handy and maximum fluidity of movement. After 10 minutes it is in your hand you seem to know him from a life as you leave embrace so so natural. Overall balance perfectly acceptable despite its length (which incidentally does not change during zooming). RnIl hood is very sturdy and long .... offers a great protection of the front lens in the movements. Focus lightning fast and super stabilizer. The focus ring does not rotate during autofocus, so you can support the lens in any way without interfering with the focus, but you can correct, however, in each moment ...... shame on a DX is a bit long as minimum focal .... on a full frame would be his! In short, a wonder. Thousand euroni but for now they seem decently spent .... well I will not say because it is not, A first object of utility in life, indeed, quite exaggerated for an amateur with the world turns economically so bad ...... HIGHLY RECOMMENDED! sent on March 13, 2014 |
 | Nikon AF-S DX 16-85mm f/3.5-5.6 G ED VR Pros: Sharpness, focal range and manual correction of the focus during AF internal Cons: Cartoon a lot, is dim, dark indeed, precisely, the stabilizer is not much vaunted amazing Opinion: Bought and paid for objective professional "hearsay" where everybody talks about it well, I found myself very badly. He looks very lean and economical. the hood is very thin and very fragile. The much-touted 4-stop stabilizer is not worth what they say. many goals "inferior" have brighter, better stabilizer and appear even more rewarding asteticamente. It seems to have about a 18 55 a kit for beginners ...... the photos are crisp but much cartoon at maximum aperture at all focal lengths and more openness is very limited in time and forcing ISO much higher than I repeat, combined with the handsome little stabilizer creates blurry images often making you miss the best moment of the scene ...... nikon first lens of my story and maybe last ....... although I'm considering a super telephoto 70 300 IF the nikon that others seem to remain a little behind on this end ...... sent on November 26, 2013 |
 | Sigma 17-70mm f/2.8-4 DC OS HSM Macro C Pros: sharpness, contrast, weight / performance ratio, brightness, quality of construction, smoothness rings, robustness Cons: you can not adjust the focus manually without first turning off the autofocus button dall'apposito Opinion: I was looking for a lens for sharp images and brilliant live (my all make 18 200 on the D3100 was perfect, but on the D7000 to the intermediate focal leaves much to be desired). I have tried other goals, but then I decided that bellllllloooooo sigma .... that is ........ photos in dim light freehand with time and iso average low ..... razor-sharp pictures in full sun all focal lengths and apertures ..... good wide angle and short telephoto for all who make less stringent than others but of excellent quality, workmanship and performance. I am very happy with the purchase and I will bring back certainty of its performance ...... sent on November 26, 2013 |
 | Tokina AT-X Pro 11-16mm f/2.8 DX II Pros: Excellent brightness and true color rendition. a bit of flare on the light. Very limited in size and weight but sturdy and well proporsionato Cons: The bezel to switch from autofocus to manual focus is very hard to move and this often involves moving the machine, especially if on a tripod Opinion: Wonderful ... I recommend ... be careful, however, that the focus is subject to the motor inside the camera body and therefore will not work with SLRs cheaper .... A great wide-angle lens. I come from a Tamron 10-24 who had horrendous distortions and vignettava lot. I sold it and switched to this and it paid off almost the double expense .... I can not use other targets during my travels. Gorgeous views, narrow streets of villages, glimpses of squares ect ... all wonderfully crisp and very proporsionato (but be careful not to tilt the machine too much downward or upward so that you can see the disproportions ...... but this depends on the high field of view forced on small sensor DX). Too bad that the line of PRO Tokina we do not have many types, otherwise another 16-135 or similar I'd have bought gladly honor of the brand ... sent on November 10, 2013 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
