|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Brettik www.juzaphoto.com/p/Brettik  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Canon 5Ds R Pros: File sharpness. Excellent exposure meter and autofocus. Great ergonomics Cons: Files to process rather heavy. Needs good lenses Opinion: I went from 5D Mark III to 5DSR after a span of several months. The 5D Mark III is definitely a great car, and the 5DSR inherits its great features, but increases the resolution and implements a meter that, in my humble opinion, is definitely superior. I did not find microsocial or moirish problems after several hundred shots in various situations and I can say that the car works well in all areas. Certainly not suitable for genres that require great speed but I find it perfect for portraits and landscaping. The incarnate yield is really great and the files do not need much elaboration. I was afraid that high ISO yield was definitely lower than Mark III but that's not the case and it's just noticed on the 6400 iso. Ultimately a great car with a truly sensational image quality. sent on October 14, 2017 |
 | Zeiss ZE/ZF.2 Apo Sonnar T* 135mm f/2 Pros: Sharpness, perfect optical correction, solid construction, magnificent focus. Cons: Heavy Opinion: I have owned a variety of optics for portrait of various brands (Leica, Nikon, Canon, Hasselblad, Contax) for both 35mm and medium format. Having said that, I can say (of course very personal opinion) that the Zeiss Apo Sonnar 135 is the most beautiful portrait lens I've ever used (along with the 110 F2 for Hasselblad Planar). I speak not only of sharpness (still amazing) but for a number of features that make it unique in several ways: first, the perfect optical correction. I tried to take in the most adverse lighting codizioni, with strong contrasts, but I have to say that this view is always performed beautifully. Chromatic aberration is absent, even when shooting at full aperture. The color rendering is typically Zeiss (for some a bit cold but I prefer it that way). The sharpness is absolutely incredible both the center and the edges and diaphragm brings no improvement, but an increase in PDF. Having already owned the Zeiss Makro Planar ZE feared that the focus ridifference represents difficult and inaccurate (which I had experienced with this lens). I must however say that, apart from having a ring of focus extremely fluid and precise confirmation of focus is always to be false (on the body 5D Mark II) and I have not encountered any problems front or back focus. The focus is very progressive and very enjoyable. The only drawback is the considerable weight but it is also the logical consequence of a solid and flawless mechanical construction. Although compared to the great Canon 135 F2L, the Zeiss is superior in all respects. A perspective that I would warmly recommend to lovers of the portrait. sent on July 08, 2016 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
