|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Meniero www.juzaphoto.com/p/Meniero  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Nikon FTZ II Pros: Lightweight and maintains fast AF Cons: It does not have a slot to mount internal filters. It does not have a foot to put an attachment for a photographic head. Opinion: It is simply an extension cord that maintains electrical contacts between the optics and mirrorless, the price is too high. About the attachment to the photographic head: they could have drawn it according to the thickness of the Z9 instead of removing it. Despite having these flaws it is indispensable to use the old optics on the Z system. Rating 5/10 because the "cons" I have listed for me are important sent on August 17, 2022 |
 | Sigma 14mm f/1.8 DG HSM Art Pros: Silent and fast autofocus, plastic and soft bokeh, excellent sharpness already in the center from the largest openings that becomes uniform from f / 2.8 onwards, tropicalized construction, robust and elegant, very low distortion and fall of light Cons: Weight (1.1Kg) and overall dimensions, backlit, minimum diaphragm at f / 16 Opinion: I come from two Canon EF14 / 2.8 and a Tamron 15-30 / 2.8 this lens seems on another planet, it is really impressive positively below on all aspects. It 'sa small masterpiece of optics that have it or not have it makes the difference in a kit of a professional photographer or advanced amateur photographer. Vignetting is visible logically at f / 1.8, but just close one stop to eliminate it almost completely. You deserve sensors from at least 40Mpx sent on November 26, 2017 |
 | Sigma 135mm f/1.8 DG HSM Art Pros: Fast and silent autofocus, robust and tropicalized (perhaps less than Canon L) elegant construction (but not the Otus), exceptional sharpness (superior to Sigma 85 / 1.4 Art), bokeh plastic in the front and rear planes, excellent distortion control Minimum vignetting, 82-inch filter diameter (not 86mm like 85 Art) Cons: Reading chromatic aberrations (if you find them), held in backlight, the lack of stabilizer for me is not a fault. The price? It depends on the pockets. Opinion: A virtually perfect optic, with a simple embarrassing sharpness from the corners of f / 2.8 af / 5.6 and also holds optimally from f / 2.5 to af / 8. The diameter of the 82mm filters makes it unusual for 86mm filters that fit the 85 Art. Bearing deformation is imperceptible and light falls only af / 1.8, already at f / 2.5 disappears. The blur is quite soft. I briefly compared it with the Sigma 85 Art with a FF and I found that the 85 is softer and more suitable for the incarnate of the portraits, but the 135 is drier and more suited to the narrow landscapes even if it is also born as a focal For portraits. I would have liked to have a collar to better balance it on the tripod because the center of gravity with the 5DMK3 attached is near the SIGMA letter on the barrel. I bought it to replace the Canon EF 70-200 f / 2.8L Is II, as first impressions the 135 seems superior on all fronts, weighs 300gr less and is more; Short of 8 cm. It's a pity that 135 can not duplicate. For me it's worth its price and I voted 10/10 here on juzaphoto. sent on May 30, 2017 |
 | Canon 5D Mark III Pros: Ergonomics, pentaprism, customization, excellent AF Cons: Noise greater than the 6D, price, lack shutter viewfinder, the WiFi and GPS Opinion: B in each type of situation. And it is a product of high performance with exceptional reliability. The overall progress compared to the MKII is unquestionable and the new AF is really efficient and sensitive. It 'hard to find gaps in a camera like this, so consider it just a forklift 1D X would be too simplistic. Finding weaknesses in this product is very difficult, but if you wanted to be really picky to find the "nit", then you should peek between the specific competitors or the Magic Lantern firmware to find some feature that ours would could have had more. So you find that the only real rival is the direct competitor Nikon D800, which seems to have an extra gear for almost a stop more dynamic range, resolution and for images less soft (chapeau). rnConcludo the staff review by stating that the camera is simply thrilling and highly recommended. If I had to give it a vote, I'd give it 9/10, while thethe MKII would give 7/10 and the MKI 6 + / rn 10.rn. ....... ........ rnrnHo written the full review on my website: http://www.meniero. it sent on November 01, 2013 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
