|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Darklay www.juzaphoto.com/p/Darklay  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Manfrotto 498 RC2 Pros: Robust enough, fluid head, adjustable clutch in hardness. Cons: Weight, above all height. Opinion: It was my first head, unfortunately despite having the adjustable clutch it is always a ball head, so not precise; I soon changed it with one to three movements with which I'm definitely better off for studio photos and an overview of landscapes; the problem is not the 298 but the ball head concept I do not like. The 498 is a good ball head, fluid and the clutch adjusts toughness to be used in speed or more precise, also has a lock for rotating the horizontal axis (they call panorama but do not allow you to set the nodal point, so ...) which may be convenient to move the camera horizontally without having to unlock the sphere to miss the other settings.rnTo add up if you are looking for a good ball head, solid and precise that does not cost too much, this is fine. sent on November 05, 2017 |
| Manfrotto 498 RC2 Pros: Robust enough, fluid head, adjustable clutch in hardness. Cons: Weight, above all height. Opinion: It was my first head, unfortunately despite having the adjustable clutch it is always a ball head, so not precise; I soon changed it with one to three movements with which I'm definitely better off for studio photos and an overview of landscapes; the problem is not the 298 but the ball head concept I do not like. The 498 is a good ball head, fluid and the clutch adjusts toughness to be used in speed or more precise, also has a lock for rotating the horizontal axis (they call panorama but do not allow you to set the nodal point, so ...) which may be convenient to move the camera horizontally without having to unlock the sphere to miss the other settings.rnTo add up if you are looking for a good ball head, solid and precise that does not cost too much, this is fine. sent on November 05, 2017 |
 | Benro HD1 Pros: Lightweight, small, well-built Cons: the cost Opinion: The head is well done, small and lightweight, the three paths are fluid, the knobs are used well, though little seems empty-resistant, I say seems because not è.rnHo a manfrotto the ball 498 which is much more massive, weighs heavily more and gives you a feeling of strength, as well as the 804 three-way that I got to use a lot more robust and heavy, the larger knobs and piene.rnLa Benro HD1 compared to the above manfrotto looks like a "toy" although then in practice is left to use as the 804, surely it is better to bring it back as it weighs and cluttered meno.rnUnico neo maybe the price, which is very similar to manfrotto 804, at that price I probably would have taken the manfrotto, just that having found the Benro used at a low price (20 €) I wanted prenderla.rnSe serves a light head and small but still stable and strong, this is fine, otherwise better manfrotto 804 for the same price. sent on September 01, 2016 |
 | Manfrotto 709B Pros: Small, lightweight, stable, solid. Cons: ball head small, it takes a little 'patience to stabilize it with great optics Opinion: It 'a good tripod, small but solid and stable. The head is very small and tends to make it a little 'difficult to place with great optics, tends to give a little' just stop, but then stabilizes. I tried it with a Nikon D7000 with 80-200 True union and regge.rnEsiste the Manfrotto MTT2-P02 silver instead of black, which is identical to the 709B only changes the league in which they made the legs, but it is identical, holds up the same way and costs of a 15 euro less. I have them both and for practical use, there are no differences sent on March 09, 2015 |
 | Sony NEX 3N Pros: Size, weight, quality, cost (bought new on 01/22/2014 267 €), good ergonomics Cons: The construction seems very sturdy, the buttons seem fragilini, external battery charger is not included in the package, is included only direct the charger to charge the battery inside the camera, uncomfortable, first accessory to buy 2nd battery with external charger. No electronic viewfinder rn Opinion: The machine works well, has a good sensor, it has a decent menu, the buttons are customizable, though it has only one prayer, manual work is not a problem, since it passes swiftly to diaphragms with a single button and then change them the ring, the adjustment of the iso has a special button (but still are all programmable as we like better). RNLA quality in general is very good, holds up well high ISO, the sensor is known to sony 16.1 megapixel sensor that mounts also d7000.rnIl the Nikon built-in flash is quite powerful and has a good management, the focus is not fast but is precise, thanks to the manual focus peaking is easy to focus, which allows the use of vintage manual focus lenses without problems and with a maf fast and precisa.rnPer its low cost is fine, if you have greater needs, such as the electronic viewfinder, the second ring, the hot shoe etc you must direct serious about 5 or 6, but cost significantly more . rnIo I got to have a machine read for daily use and for use M42 lenses without problems maf sent on January 24, 2014 |
 | Nikon AF 28mm f/2.8 D Pros: Well built, good quality, light weight, small, blurred pleasing, robust. Cons: not fast autofocus in low light Opinion: I bought it to have a "normal" on DX, the 35mm seemed too long, this is perfect, almost meets my field of visuale.rnE 'bright enough, has a mass of fire 25cm to 2.8 allows a good blurred and a discrete enlargement soggetto.rnHa a good yield even if it is not comparable to that of 24mm AF-D.rnBellissima the yield cromatica.rnLa version D of 28mm has a different optical scheme and a quality inferiore.rnrn sent on September 09, 2013 |
 | Nikon AF 24-85mm f/2.8-4 D IF Pros: Small size, good performance on DX, good focal range (for me is the all-rounder, are the focal more use), macro function, Bright enough and good focus. Cons: New Price high (just buy used), on FX lose quality at the edges, not exactly razor sharp macro as it requires a macro lens. Opinion: And 'the zoom more use, it has a color rendering that I like a lot and a nice blurred. It 'a little' soft, the new version is much sharper but he also defends well. The macro function helps in many situations, although it is not really suitable as it does not have the sharpness and contrast that have macro lenses dedicate.rnDimensioni contained heavy and not make it an excellent lens to always carry dietro.rnA 24mm wide-angle lens has a fairly without distort too, at 85 a decent portrait lens at f / 4, which allows a pleasant out of focus. sent on September 09, 2013 |
 | Nikon AF-S DX 18-105mm f/3.5-5.6 G ED VR Pros: Quality / price ratio. Good range of focal sharp enough, very light. Cons: brightness and very plasicosa construction, including the bayonet (but this is to keep costs down, so that's okay) Opinion: Good all-rounder, from wide angle to medium zoom. I've used it very little, because it bought in a kit with the D7000. I wanted to sell it but I preferred to keep it to the outputs read a few pretese.rnHa the classic rendering of the new Nikon lenses, sharp and contrast (which I do not like it, I prefer the softer performance of the optics AF-D), good sharpness. How to 18mm wide angle distorts a bit 'too much and lose a little' quality when compared with for example the tokina 12-24, but there is in fact, all in all not bad for a view handyman and the price more than fair. sent on September 09, 2013 |
 | Nikon D50 Pros: Price (who now is the era of second). Robust, much of the current entry level. Machine somewhere between a entry level and a semi-pro., Has the breaketing, the second display and an excellent synchro flash of 1/500, and especially autofocus motor inside! Good performance at high ISO (up to 1600 and get up to 800 defends well) Cons: The second display is not lit (what it cost enlighten .. mah), no get up mirror and delayed shutter release. Missing the second ring (for shutter speed and aperture), and the commander flash, depth of field and many key programmable keys. Viewfinder is not very bright and does not cover 100% Opinion: I've made so many shots, excellent training ship, has the functions a bit 'more advanced than classic entry level and the possibility of using AF is not insignificant. It has a good yield, and up to ISO 800 is usable and it performs well, the synchro flash to 1/500 comoda.rnNonostante the very thing I did 6mpx stampre to 30x40 with a good resa.rnIo I bought 3-4 years ago used to price of 150 euro with 2nd battery, and I think that he still roams on that figure. Costs very little and many soddisfazioni.rn sent on September 09, 2013 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
