|
Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Luigig75 www.juzaphoto.com/p/Luigig75 ![]() |
![]() | Tamron SP 90mm f/2.8 Di Macro Pros: Image quality, crisp and clear 2.8, lightweight, inexpensive, macro 1:1, excellent blurred Cons: Autofocus slow and loud, long excursion of the barrel (should use it with the limiter). Unregulated (now it is the new version). Working distance for 1:1 magnification, too short, basically you have to be attached to the subject, which probably will escape. Opinion: Excellent lens, I took away a lot of satisfaction. The autofocus outrageous at the end when you do not make macro (eg portraits, for macro, manual focus with liveview 10x), but if you are not in broad daylight and you do not put the limiter, you know how many shots lost! Quality of blurred excellent and also the details. I can not find the practical system to change from manual to auto focus. sent on September 27, 2013 |
![]() | Canon 450D Pros: Weight & Dimensions (is an advantage if one wants a light body and small), Ideal for learning Cons: Bad noise and considerable loss of detail (especially in the shadows) from ISO 800 onwards. Considerable noise already present at ISO 400. Buffer too small for the barrage. Low-resolution LCD (to check if a picture is a good picture). AI Servo is not exactly the best. No video. Tends to overexpose, preferring to overexposure to the fact that the picture is likely to be greatly moved. White balance spesso.rnConcordo wrong with Sarah when he says "Cons: For a neophyte of photography I would say that there are not ... for everyone else, now is the time to upgrade to a higher model: P" rnrn Opinion: I have this camera body since 2008, was the ideal entry into the world of digital SLR cameras. The defects (see "Cons") I mentioned are normal for machines canon aps-c entry level of the time, so it's no wonder. My idea is that for beginners should be just fine. Of course I had to start today with a digital SLR, I would take a 650D (improved quality of the noise, screen resolution, higher ISO) and not a 450D, for as I am, but if one wants to spend even less, and the 450D is not for not bad, I got so many beautiful foto.rnrnInoltre I think having a car with lower limits allows you to reach them more easily and it is there that one grows from the point of view of the experience and photographic knowledge, will and when you will study the everything to defeat or circumvent those limits. When you will be forced to think even more before you take the photo, or you will become able to adapt to different environmental conditions. sent on September 27, 2013 |
May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me