|
Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Giovabubi www.juzaphoto.com/p/Giovabubi ![]() |
![]() | Canon EF-S 10-22mm f/3.5-4.5 USM Pros: Sharpness, tonal range, color rightly warm range of focal lengths, light, perspective photo Cons: Too bad that is not compatible with FF Opinion: The opinion of a user on a lens is always relative to that he was able to prove and his outfit. Therefore I present my kit: APS-C 550D, 18-55 IS, 28mm F/2.8, 50mm F/1.8 I, 24-105 f / 4, Tamron 28-300. I got the Canon 10-22 used a few months ago and I can say without a shadow of a doubt that these are the best lens I have. It has an impressive sharpness for a APS-C, the better the famed 24-105. Still I'm not sure, but I suspect, however, that the EF-S lenses (like 10-22 or 18-135, for example) are better than EF (as 24-105) on APS-C. In addition, more than the 24-105, has a nice tonal range and management of spectacular lights / shadows. Canon 10-22 fonisce crisp, warm colors, light and shade, balanced, large depth of field and of course a wide-angle perspective, and unmistakably unique. Its focal range makes it suitable to be used as the only lens trips to photograph landscapes, but also close-ups of people on the backgrounds of landscapes. Accepting the typical perspective distortion can also be used per photograph inside buildings, squares and palaces. Well suited to many situations for a trip or a vacation. In environmental portraits expresses a high edge on points of focus extolling the subject well. After your purchase I took the 24-105 to extend the range of focal lengths and shoot without distortion, but the way I photograph I found the latter much lower than the 10-22, which is then often mounted on my camera. sent on February 03, 2014 |
May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me