Reviews written by Kappa69

JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.

OK, I confirm

You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept Cookies

Customize

Refuse Cookies

Kappa69
www.juzaphoto.com/p/Kappa69

Reviews of cameras, lenses, tripods, heads and other accessories written by Kappa69

The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator.

Tamron 20-40mm f/2.8 Di III VXD

Pros: Weight, autofocus, sharpness

Cons: Lack of diaphragm dial and programmable button

Opinion: Light and compact, already very sharp at full opening but improves by closing a little. It has an autofocus like the original sony lenses for more quiet. The fact that when zooming towards the 20mm from 40mm extends very little means that on the gimbal you do not lose the balance. I found it really good also on a constructive level. I use it in the video and I must say that at the moment there is nothing like this price.

sent on July 28, 2023

Nikon AF-S 18-35mm f/3.5-4.5 G ED

Pros: Optical very sharp from the center to the edges at least on the d700, light, allows the use of filters to the plate, the seals bochettone graft, no chromatic aberration and overall economic

Cons: opening relatively dark, building not just at the highest levels although not bad, Wheel of maf a little loose, even I find the distortion to 18 physiological and easily uncorrectable for a view like this

Opinion: x as all those who have a nikon fx was not an easy choice that of wide angle, having the nikon 24-70 I was often to be desired something more wide but did not want to invest big money, so, after extensive reading and having viewed photos that are on the net, I decided to take a year and now I am very satisfied about the purchase, of course, it would have been better if he had a f2.8 aperture and a focal length of 14mm max but then it would have been another lens costing three times. rnSintetizzerei well: little cost, low weight so resa.rnDevo give credit to Nikon to have made a lens for landscape with a price / quality unbeatable nothing to do with the old 18-35 af-d that on digital displays all limits a project superato.rnLo would change only with a 16-35 f2.8 with possibility to install filters and without the useless (for optical wide) vr, but does not exist at the time.

sent on July 01, 2015