|
Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
David Casoni www.juzaphoto.com/p/DavidCasoni ![]() |
![]() | Leica Vario-Elmarit-SL 70-200mm f/2.8 ASPH Pros: Versatility, build quality, bokeh Cons: None, maybe the best 70-200 I've ever tried Opinion: I'll start by saying that, in terms of focal range, the 70-200mm is one of those lenses that I have always appreciated for its versatility, blur and overall image performance. However, this model is — in my opinion — on another level. It is an extremely sharp lens, even at full aperture, free of chromatic aberrations, vignetting or other significant visual defects. The images return a very soft and pleasing blur, which helps to reduce the perception of the narrow depth of field, giving the shots a realistic and natural look, never "squashed". Ergonomically, the lens feels solid and comfortable to hold. I particularly liked the position of the zoom ring, located at the front of the lens, a choice that, while it may be inconvenient for some, proved to be extremely functional for me. Considering the significant weight of the lens and the presence of the tripod mount, in fact, this configuration makes zooming easier, especially in dynamic or action contexts. Another point in favor is the very high build quality, in perfect Leica style: the lens is entirely made of steel, is robust and perfectly stable during use. The stabilization is also exceptional: the optical one is activated from 90 mm onwards, while up to 89 mm you rely on the stabilization of the sensor. The transition is practically imperceptible. In conclusion, I can say with conviction that this lens represents, to date, the best 70-200 mm currently available on the market. sent on June 28, 2025 |
![]() | Canon EOS R7 Pros: Shutter speed, stabilization, megapixels (on this camera they are a con in some cases) Cons: Sensor too dense for an APSC, infinite noise, buffer memory Opinion: I've had the R7 for about a year now, and while it's soon to be my backup body, I can say that it surprised me in many ways, especially when it comes to video. The stabilization is really impressive: when I shoot handheld, the result is so stable that it feels like I have used a tripod. In my opinion, it's on par with Lumix cameras, if not even better. Another point that I find really positive is the C-Log 3 color profile. For the price range of the machine, it offers good dynamic range and color rendering that makes post-production easier and more satisfying. I was particularly impressed by the ability to retain detail in both highlights and shadows, which is no small feat if you work with video. Moving on to the photo side, there are a few things worth saying. First of all, the main flaw for me concerns the handling of high ISO. I'm pretty picky about this, and I can say that when you exceed certain ISO values, the image quality deteriorates considerably. In low-light situations, you completely lose detail, colors become flat, and digital noise is quite an issue. It is a machine that, if you use it in low light conditions, needs bright optics to perform at its best. In general, kit optics aren't really the best for achieving exceptional image quality in these conditions, so it's best to focus on faster lenses (f/1.8 or f/2.8) to get the most out of the camera. For the rest, the autofocus is super responsive, accurate even with moving subjects, and the camera is really fast, with fast shutter speeds and an exposure system that adapts well to different light conditions. The build quality is solid, the grip is comfortable even during long shoots. I conclude by saying that the R7 is a camera that works great for videos, with a stabilization that has nothing to envy to more expensive models, and a color profile that greatly facilitates the work in post-production. However, when it comes to low-light photos, it's crucial to use bright optics to get really good images. sent on May 10, 2025 |
May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me