|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Luca Benini www.juzaphoto.com/p/LucaBenini  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Tamron 15-30mm f/2.8 VC USD Pros: Cost - construction - sharpness Cons: weight Opinion: At first it was enthusiastic of this lens, but with the passage of time the defects are left and are importanti.rnTropicalizzazione: quite fictitious, humidity and splashing pass all right and become a big problem when the temperature changes tarnish the front lens . The only real "tamron" tropical conditions is the Pentax model that costs twice but really resistant to agents atmosferici.rnNel time (I had 2 models, one canon and nikon one) I found one of the infinite slip having to seek the assistance to recalibrate the obiettivo.rnFlare not abnormal but presente.rnRivestimento fluoride useful and well done. Worth what costarn sent on May 03, 2017 |
 | Sigma 12-24mm f/4 DG HSM Art Pros: Sharpness-Building-Focal-Price Cons: Lack of tropicalization Opinion: I used the Canon 11-24, the Nikon 14-24, and lastly the Tamron 15-30. I have to say that this Sigma beat them all three, Flare virtually absent, distortion manageable unlike Canon, so many more than Nikon and Tamron. The lack of tropicalization resolves smoothly by covering the lens. Tamron has a dummy that does not actually protect me from splashing and rain because I sent it back to assistance 2 without solving the problem. RnThere is plenty to be passed on to this ART series! Sharpness is also excellent with open diaphragms and the construction is really well done! The price is far below the Canon 11-24 and slightly at Nikon 14-24. sent on May 03, 2017 |
 | Sony A7 Pros: all I would say. a novelty after so many bodies all the same. Cons: the only cons that actually exists is a slight loss of detail when using a telephoto lens on a tripod for exposures that are very short. Opinion: I write this opinion solely to respond to Sergio from you that after the speech of "Mom canon" made me laugh in the park crepapelle.rnil optics was known to be tight at the beginning so it is not a defect but a simple matter of fact, was not a surprise. a7r my batteries but does not go to but rather a battery and will fight lasts exactly on 300 shots and I do not think it's right to throw away, alternatively you can buy 2-3 batteries and it is apostolic as do all photographers. the charger costs 5 € in ebay. however I do not know if Mom has a canon body with this weight with 36 mpx with this performance .... the viewfinder is not a disaster is simply live view sent on February 04, 2014 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
