|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Saveriocz www.juzaphoto.com/p/Saveriocz  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Nikon D3300 Pros: Complete and robust entry level Cons: For its price nothing in particular Opinion: It was my first DSLR, previously I used a Canon Powershot 500 bridge. Bought in 2016, with 18/55 and 70/300 DX, I preferred it to the entry level Canon of the time because of the 24 mega sensor instead of the 18 of the competitor and I must say that I did not regret it at all. It was perfect to introduce me into the reflex world, easy to use completely in manual, small and light, it holds well in the hand, capable of churning out very sharp shots. The ISO hold is good up to 1600, but in well-lit urban environments at night I used it with decent results even at 3200, even if the noise, of course, is noticeable. The AF, when used on static subjects or in slow movements, is absolutely up to par. After a couple of years I also took the 35mm fixed 1.8 ED FX and I must say that with this lens it has become a sort of "little bomb", in portraits or in urban night shots with a fixed camera and long exposure it is a combination capable of bringing out beautiful photos. To add that it is also very robust, it fell to the ground a couple of times without consequences. I sold it after six years of great satisfaction to get an FF. It is a perfect camera to start with, to be recommended without a shadow of a doubt to those who want to enter the reflex world or, in any case, have a "serious" camera without breaking the bank. For value for money I give it a more than deserved 9. sent on July 29, 2024 |
 | Nikon AF-S 24-120mm f/4 G ED VR Pros: Versatility, VR, fast AF (not very fast..) Cons: Distortion but, above all, painful, pe-no-so (!) in the flare resistance, exaggerated price. Opinion: I bought it recently, new extract from kit with a three-year warranty at a reasonable price, slightly higher than that of the 24-85. I think I've already summarized the meaning of this lens. It offers good sharpness on almost the entire field, but not at F4, where, over the entire zoom range, it loses in this respect. The distortion is evident, at least up to 35 mm and you have to take it into account when composing the photo if you want to correct it in pp. VR very effective, the AF is quite fast but not like that of the 70/300 I already owned. The color rendering is beautiful and seems faithful to the reality of what you are shooting. The best thing about it is the versatility given by the wide focal range, which allows you to keep it mounted in at least 80% of situations. What's wrong, but really isn't right? The flare tightness! I have called it pitiful, and I am not exaggerating. If you take photos against the light towards the sun it is already very evident, but it is in night photos with a fixed camera and long exposure that it is simply impossible to use it. If you love to shoot city streets, with street lamps and illuminated signs, with even a single light point barely more intense than the others, and maybe with a little black sky in the background, well, it's better if you change the lens, forget about using this one! Full stop. Unless you like to find files flooded up to 65 (65!!! Sic..) between luminous globes and other artifacts of various shapes and colors. After the first few days of use, really demoralized, I wanted to take advantage of the right of withdrawal and return it, as I had done previously and for the same reason with two 24-85s (one used and one new); In the end I resigned myself and kept it, mostly because of the versatility of its focal range; and for the kind of night photos that I love to take so much, well, it means that, when I can use it, I will mount the 35 fixed 1.8ED which, despite being six years old, with a nice fall on the ground on its shoulders and dirt of dust to the limit inside, even in that area hardly disappoints me. What can I say, to sum up, the price of the new Nital (I've seen sites that give it even at 1,300 Euros....) I think it's disproportionate for what it offers, adequate if you find bulk like mine. I would give him a 9 final grade, but given how he behaves in the situations described, I go down to 7. He doesn't deserve more. sent on April 10, 2024 |
 | Nikon AF-S 35mm f/1.8G Pros: Great sharpness, effective autofocus, robust. Cons: Nothing in particular Opinion: I bought this lens six years ago for the "small" D3300 and since then it has been the standard lens for me. With the small sensor it shows off beautiful, sharp and correct Jpegs at full aperture, splendid color rendering. In the night photos of urban landscapes, fixed cameras and long poses, he gave me great satisfaction, bringing out images that, as a pure amateur without who knows what technical baggage, have always seemed to me beautiful to lick my fingers. In these situations the autofocus is very effective, it rarely misses a shot (unlike the other Nikkor at my disposal, the 16-85 ED DX, which, as far as focusing at night was a half ordeal). It's also sturdy. Once, together with the camera, it fell from about a meter and a half, and after the initial panic, except for one of the fixing tabs of the lens hood, I was able to see that it was not damaged, and the operation remained at its maximum. I've been using it on a full frame for about a year now. With the large sensor you can see a little distortion at the edges in the photos, which was obviously cut before, and in night photos in the city sometimes a few too many flares, but nothing excessive. The same resolution of 24megapixels, spread on the larger surface of the FF sensor, makes it lose a little engraving. In any case, overall, also considering the still affordable price, I would say that it is a piece to have absolutely in the kit. sent on November 20, 2023 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
