|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
_franz_ www.juzaphoto.com/p/_franz_  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Canon RF 10-20mm f/4 L IS Pros: angle of view, contrast, sharpness, color richness, footprint, weight Cons: No one, as far as I'm concerned Opinion: As a happy owner of the Canon EF 11-24mm f/4 L USM I thought that such a lens could not be improved and so, switched from the 5D MKIV to the R5 I used that lens with the adapter for a few months. Unfortunately, the bulk, weight and "unbalance" during use convinced me to change it to the Canon RF 10-f/4 L IS, hoping to maintain the same level of quality. After a few weeks of use I had to change my mind: if I didn't think an improvement was possible, I noticed quite a few. Beyond the millimeter gained in amplitude (and the 4 lost, but I also have the 24-70 and therefore it is not serious) I found myself with a lighter, more balanced lens, with better color rendering and, at least apparently, with better sharpness at the edges. All other defects are easily eliminated in post-production. Personally, I rarely use this lens for landscapes or architectural photos, I prefer to use it because it allows me to "get to the heart of it" of many situations (dance, sports, concerts...) where there is no "main subject" but the action is the focus of the event. As for the price, I find it in line with the quality of the product and is even lower than the Canon EF 11-24mm f/4L USM. Indispensable for "creative photography". sent on July 21, 2024 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
