|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Frasmo www.juzaphoto.com/p/Frasmo  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Tamron SP 70-300mm f/4-5.6 Di VC USD Pros: Construction, price, VR, MAF usd, final quality above 200 Cons: Nobody Opinion: The sharpness is very good at all focal even at maximum. Having first 70-300 Sigma APO unregulated, with the difference that you see and hear. The weight for me is a pro because it makes you realize the quality of optics. Well built. Lens hood supplied with spectacular petal. The stabilizer also allows you to reduce the time without losing qualità.rn sent on May 24, 2016 |
 | Canon EF-S 24mm f/2.8 STM Pros: image quality, weight, quiet Cons: Missing the hood and be picky the ring of maf is almost nonexistent Opinion: I bought it to have in the bag all fixed objectives. And most of all to have a excellent picture quality. It 's really a big surprise. Bright and sharp even at full aperture. When I bring it around to be light it seems to have a compact. The focus is fast and accurate. Nothing to blame except the lens hood that must be bought separately and costs madness. sent on May 06, 2016 |
 | Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 STM Pros: Construction, bokeh, sharpness Cons: None Opinion: Finally it has been updated. Bayonet metal, more solid construction and with the addition of the system stm has become even more silent. Without a shadow of doubt, a great lens to have in the bag. 7 sipes fuzzy softer and more "round". The focus is much more accurate than its predecessor and takes away. It decreased the distance of focus. Beautiful! sent on August 05, 2015 |
 | Canon EF 28mm f/2.8 Pros: Light weight, price, yield on APSC Cons: On any APSC Opinion: I used 28 to 150 Euros. I needed a fixed focal length of 1.8 to 50 take me back together. I found it comfortable. during the day with good brightness it is perfect. I found him handsome even during the sunsets when the sunlight becomes reddish. Opening 2.8 behaves quite well, f4 from the massimo.rnPerfetto for Street, on APSC becomes a 50mm. At this price it's a bargain. No longer do so, it is only used having no luck. sent on May 26, 2015 |
 | Sigma AF 70-300mm f/4-5.6 DG APO Macro Pros: Construction, quality lenses, focal length, sharpness Cons: Lack of sharpness between 200 and 300 Opinion: The first focal ultra zoom to coprare. The value for money is excellent. I use it for portraits and wildlife. Up to 200 mm is very clear, after losing a lot. In conditions of high brightness is excellent, 70 mm scares. Avoid use with low light, indeed shoot at 1/80 with a lens so far and it is almost impossible not stabilized. sent on May 26, 2015 |
 | Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 II Pros: Price, weight, focus, brightness Cons: Building Opinion: Nothing to reproach to this objective. The only drawback is the construction. The bayonet coupling could be done in metal. When you make the first photos in 1.8 you realize you are holding a nice lens. It is usually the first piece that you buy. Blur well is very bright. To those who say it is noisy if you want to answer that obbettivo silent nun must spend 370 Euros and not 90. Sometimes it does not hook the subject well, but only in low light conditions. They learn a lot of things and is the best way of discovering the world of fixed focal. sent on May 26, 2015 |
 | Canon EF-S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 IS STM Pros: Focus fast, weight, price, does not seem to kit Cons: Dim Opinion: In my kit it was not there. There was the 18-55 unregulated. A bottom of the bottle. When I had the opportunity I got used to 80 euro. Never having had a lens and stabilized stm really surprised me. The focus is ultra quiet, fast. And 'precise enough, in proportion with the price and quality of lenti.rnFino to 40 mm is quite clear. Above loses a bit 'but nothing to worry about. sent on May 26, 2015 |
 | Samyang 8mm f/3.5 UMC Fish-eye CS II Pros: Excellent construction, very crisp Cons: None Opinion: I got this lens a few years ago. At first it was a real surprise, because with this corner of the field, when you look in the viewfinder to enter another world. Someone complains of focus or lack of confirmation ... But 8mm I explained what good !!! ??? rnComunque using it both for landscapes but also for creative photos at weddings. Believe me instead buy Canon 1000 euro, spending only about 300 euro you will have in hand an object really fantastic. sent on May 26, 2015 |
 | Samyang 85mm f/1.4 Aspherical IF Pros: Price, building, blurred Cons: Lens cap, made difficult fire to 1.4 but not impossible Opinion: I bought this lens used at 200 Euros. I own a Canon 500D, so I only have available the metering communication. The focus not having the confirmation chip is not there. At first it does an incredible effort, because you are not used to focus manually. In good lighting conditions at 1.4 it is difficult but with a little 'practice you settle things. 1.8 up does his duty. In low light 1.4 is an enterprise focus. But it's so manually. rnCon opening 4 is devastating. Bought used at this price is a bargain or not. I rediscovered what it means to use the machine manually. rnGrande excellent sharpness and focus. With the use of Live View 1.4 it is also accurate. sent on May 26, 2015 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
