|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Siberius www.juzaphoto.com/p/Siberius  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Manfrotto 498 RC2 Pros: solid construction, block panoramic Cons: quality low price, heavy for the services provided, not very precise movements of the sphere Opinion: I got this ball head for several years, very solid construction, attack rc2 not the best of quality, but small and not very tight time ingombrante.Una is stationary with the gear attached, but to use the properties of the sphere is difficult because small and imprecisa.Troppo heavy for the services offre.Avendola replaced with a Sirui k30x which costs only 30 euro more, it has a huge ball, is precise, smooth and even stronger manfrotto despite the weight of a hair lower, I can not give an assessment eccelsa.Secondo me the 498 is a middle inutile.Meglio a compact and economical sphere as the 494 or the like, or a more professional sphere investing in something più.Valutazione 7 more than enough. sent on August 11, 2014 |
 | Sirui N2205 Pros: Compact, lightweight, excellent build quality, worth what it costs. Cons: blocks leg ring impractical. Opinion: After having had two Manfrotto (055XPROB and one small carbon 732CY) I took this Sirui that is the perfect compromise between the reality due.In I have the new model n2205x than however it does not seem different from the old, I do not know what they have improved. rnSolido as the 055 has a hook under the center column to hang a few kilo for greater stability, may become a monopod leg, legs by unscrewing them blast out nails in certain situations indispensabili.Le legs close to 180 degrees by incorporating the head with my Sirui k30x remain slightly wide as the attachment plate of the head style Ark is huge, but with a slightly smaller head would close quietly all in 42 cm.Le legs into 5 sections measured 28-25-22-19 -16, when comparing these sections with similar models from other brands (Manfrotto, Gitzo) it is clear that the flow rate of 12 kg is not far from reality, if you are holding 6-7 kg on the tripod you use it in an excellent manner there is no sort of push-ups and weight only gives stability & aserious.; The column is composed of two sections, if you want you can mount the short piece of wire for shots terreno.L 'inclination of the legs can be adjusted very quickly with a semi-automatic lever molla.Secondo me the only flaw are blocks the leg and center column ring, the levers are locked when closed, maybe sometimes you have to retighten the screw if you loose, these rings are made very well, with dust seals etc, but they are not tight pratici.Una time are very solid but you have to tighten them well one by one, and the operation is not immediate and obvious as you can pensare.Se you do something fast you risk that it closes a section and everything will hang from a parte.rnLo same applies to the central column , you have to tighten bene.Comunque for all the features and advantages it offers is an excellent tripod if they put the levers for me would be 10 and lode.In any case well worth the money despite the rings. sent on August 04, 2014 |
 | Sigma 85mm f/1.4 EX DG HSM Pros: Brightness, value for money, good high sharpness wide open already, boken excellent. Cons: Autofocus is not always flawless and only moderately fast, color fringing on the edges visible to f/2.8 Opinion: For what it costs is a great lens, less cumbersome and heavy 85 canon, case and lens hood, to fully enjoy this lens recommended full frame, not cropped makes giustizia.Per instance a 50 on aps-c is not equal to un'85 FF.Oggi of the term of comparison used is the angle of the field covered and lost too much weight yield and the characteristics of the focal length. sent on January 02, 2012 |
 | Canon 7D Pros: High resolution, accurate AF and fairly fast, highly customizable, usability and ergonomics, exceptional viewfinder and screen, battery life, quality-competitive price. Cons: sensor excellent performance at high iso low, jpeg processed by the camera just sufficient, intuitive configuration, meter just ok, use the flash requires a lot of experience tendency to overexpose. Opinion: Use the 7D with great satisfaction from a year or so, the camera body, customization and usability is top notch as the quality and performance of the shutter burst and my memorizzazione.Il is used very wide ranging from landscape to reportage professional services (ceremonies, theater, fashion, etc.) and in some areas they come out the limits of this macchina.Questo is a sensor that brings out the best needs a lot of light, the exposure has to be perfect to the limit cut highlights, shadows otherwise closing the blacks take over the dynamic range is reduced by molto.I file underexposed details are mixed, oversaturated colors and a high contrast, recovery is difficult when shooting in raw and jpeg are bad . When you are forced to work in low light and you can not come up with the time of exposure above a certain threshold (reportage, theaters) unfortunately the sensor shows its limiti.Il maximum you can ask the sensor is iso 800 as a this sensitivity tolla minimum even slight underexposure files fall like quality when shooting quickly and almost instinctive it is not uncommon capiti.Per landscapes and portraits are also fine as ISO 3200 noise reduction in a selective and aggressive in case ' not affect the other risultato.L 'use with the flash is not the most accurate, in theory you can set almost anything, in practice the meter gives readings approximate in this field is still nikon imbattuta.Ho got to also use a 5D and a 1DMkIV, the 1D is impressive especially for the AF and performance at high ISO quality and quantity of noise, but it costs 3 times 7D.Tutto in all, the judgment is totally positive, to give the best this car has need to be known and lived and will not regret the money spent. sent on August 10, 2011 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
