|
Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
NicolaRaho www.juzaphoto.com/p/NicolaRaho ![]() |
![]() | Panasonic G9 Pros: PRO body, dual SD slots, 4k video, internal stabilization, pleasure of use Cons: Photo quality, ISO Opinion: I bought this machine at the end of October giving away my d7100. I gained a lighter but even more robust body, with an intuitive interface and many interesting functions - among other things very easy to select already in the quick menu with the touch screen. I used it combined leica 15mm, pana 25mm, pana 42.5mm and 7artisans 60mm macro. The strong points are certainly the videos: articulated screen very comfortable even in photography, 4k video up to 60 fps, many color profiles and the possibility of having a more flat one to manage in post. The ergonomics of the body is very good, very reminiscent of that of a classic SLR but with a lot of technology inside and greater handling especially combined with lenses of really ridiculous dimensions. In practice, if you bring with you the body plus 3 of the lenses that I have listed on (15, 25, 42.5) you get to about 1kg. Cons: the small sensor implies that the photo must be composed almost perfectly already during shooting, the possibilities of crop are very limited. The malleability of the files is also low, the dynamic range is lower than a mid-low range apsc (as can be the nikon d7100). This is also due to the fact that the photos almost totally lack fine detail (even with high-end lenses, a concept that I will resume later). The stabilization of the sensor helps a lot, you can compensate for the absent iso seal with very long shutter speeds, even 1/6 freehand without too many problems. But if by chance you have to go up with the iso, already at 1600 the detail in the photos drops drastically. Bought with the idea of making videos in the naturalistic field thinking of buying the panaleica 100-400, I sold it after seeing the poor quality of the raw made with g9 + panaleica 100-400 that gave lower results than those I obtained with d7100 and tamron 100-400. Consiliatissima for videomakers, with 700 euros in the used you take home a beast, highly recommended for those looking for a very light set up to take on excursions with even the choice of slower, not recommended for those looking for so much quality in the files. sent on February 20, 2022 |
![]() | Nikon D7100 Pros: Cost used, construction, ergonomics, ease of use, file quality, dual sd slots Cons: buffer, high iso Opinion: It was my second camera, the first was the d3100. An upgrade to say the least huge. The d7100 is built very well, certainly not tropicalized like the top models of the range, but I have never been afraid to take it on any excursion, nor have I ever felt I had to treat it with too much respect because it has always given me a sense of solidity. For what it costs, to a machine with two sd slots, the interface and the color science of nikon, combined with a paste and workability of the photos very very good is difficult to find flaws. Of course if you come from a d850 you can not recover the shadows in the same way, but I took landscapes, night, portraits and rarely disappointed me. It loses a bit if you push it in very dynamic actions such as nature photography, it has a rather limited buffer (about 6 shots) and clearly does not have the tracking functions of the higher-end machines (even true that it is 5 times less) but still with patience and a little technique the shots are taken home and how. I made some very pushed crops on bird photographs and it hardly disappointed me. Even on astrophotography clearly at iso 6400 at night it loses a little, but I guarantee you that if you know how to manage the post the result will still be very good. In my opinion a lady camera, excellent for learning (perhaps even too much), perfect for intermediate photographers and in my opinion an excellent choice even for a professional if he is looking for a second body without fainting. sent on February 20, 2022 |
May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me