RCE Foto

(i) On JuzaPhoto, please disable adblockers (let's see why!)






Login LogoutJoin JuzaPhoto!
JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.


OK, I confirm


You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept CookiesCustomizeRefuse Cookies

CriSca
www.juzaphoto.com/p/CriSca



Reviews of cameras, lenses, tripods, heads and other accessories written by CriSca


Microsoft Translator  The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator.

nikon_d3100Nikon D3100

Pros: Small and lightweight, good image quality at low ISO, used price.

Cons: It has only one bezel, few controls, poorly performing screen, viewfinder with poor coverage, focus often failing, slow, a lot of digital noise already from 800 ISO.

Opinion: It was my first SLR and I remember it very fondly. I was very young and, consequently, penniless and receiving it as a gift was a dream for me. I had a lot of fun with her and learned a lot of things. Of the cons listed by me most are understandable being a relatively cheap and dated entry level, but two were very annoying for me: - the screen resolution was low and did not allow me to understand if in the photos taken there was micro-move or an inaccurate focus (if you add that the machine did not have a very performing autofocus ...) - to change almost all the shooting settings you had to enter the menu as there are few keys and only one dial ... I think this is also a problem of the other entry level d3*** and d5***. I wonder how you can learn to photograph without having the opportunity to modify the parameters appropriately.

sent on October 20, 2021


nikon_d600Nikon D600

Pros: Full frame with good performance and still current at a very low price (used of course).

Cons: Considering the price none.

Opinion: I sold my old SLR to buy an ML, but after a few months I was seized by an atrocious nostalgia for the mirror ... the noise, the optical viewfinder, that feeling of having in your hands something not only electronic but also a bit mechanical ... I know that some of you can understand me. Not to mention that the F mount gives access to a huge optical park and in this the Z are still a bit immature. I found a d600 at a really affordable price and I could not resist, so I took it as a second "battle" camera body. I was pleasantly surprised by its performance, considering it's a car from a good 9 years ago! The sensor is still current, the resistance to ISO (6400 + extension) is not bad at all (although the Z6 of course is an undisputed queen in this, they can not be compared). Personally I find it very ergonomic, the controls are all there and in the right places and has weight and small dimensions to be a full frame SLR. It is a machine that was born with some standard problems, around you find them with shutter replaced ... mine no, the dealer assured me that Nikon still provides free assistance out of warranty but for now it seems to me there is no need. Nikon had replaced it after a year with the d610 and this contributes to further lowering the price in the used. As cons, for the price at which I bought it, I don't feel like saying anything. Accustomed to the Z6 I am a little indisposed by the fact that all the points of MAF are in the center, but it is a matter of habit. Basically, I recommend it to those who want a second camera body, to those who do not have many economic resources and, above all, to those who want to start with photography instead of buying an entry level of dubious quality, perhaps spending even more.

sent on October 20, 2021


viltrox_af35_f1-8Viltrox AF 35mm f/1.8

Pros: Costs less than Nikon, lightweight, fast and accurate autofocus

Cons: Inaccurate attachment, vignetting, bearing distortion

Opinion: It is a good lens that can meet my amateur photography needs. I used it little for now but it seems quite sharp (although far from the sharpness of the Nikkor Z 50mm 1.8), fast and precise focus like the original Z (I have not tried it with the videos though), excellent resistance to flare ... It has the inaccurate attack and I find it a bit difficult to remove it, but nothing serious all in all. The focus ring is sliding, there is also a ring for opening the diaphragm. What bothers me is the vignetting in my opinion excessive, visible up to f5.6. Update: after trying it a little more I decided to make a return. The distortion seems excessive to me, despite the distortion control activated on the camera, even compared to the 24-70 f4 S zoom at 35 mm. Ditto the vignetting which is even more evident if the control vignetting on the chamber is deactivated.

sent on September 27, 2021




 ^

JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.

Mobile Version - juza.ea@gmail.com - Terms of use and Privacy - Cookie Preferences - P. IVA 01501900334 - REA 167997- PEC juzaphoto@pec.it

May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me