|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Studio_dilillo www.juzaphoto.com/p/Studio_dilillo  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Samyang MF 14mm f/2.8 RF/Z Pros: Optically it is the same lens produced also for Fmount of which it takes all the advantages in terms of optics and performance (there are dozens of reviews to get an idea) Cons: Excessive weight, lack of electronics, rough bayonet manufacturing. Opinion: A shame really. I think Samyang's desire was to make a pro lens, but probably in Korea they did things a bit hastily. The lens is very heavy, it weighs even more than the Fmount + Ftz version. In addition, the lack of electronics is felt. it becomes a problem to shoot in S (time priority) and even worse you can't get the exif data of the photo with the exact focal length (in the menu for lenses without CPU there is no possibility to set the focal length of 14 mm). Last but not least, I assume due to Samyang's inexperience in producing bayonets for the z-system, the lens had a decent clearance on the bayonet. I don't know if it was a problem with just my specimen. In the end I decided to return, I bought again for 160 € the F mount version that I had resold a few days before, sent on February 04, 2024 |
 | Nikon AF-S 28mm f/1.8 G Pros: Sharpness and yield especially at RT. Lightweight and precise AF Cons: Case supplied with ridiculous (they have reduced the thickness of the microfiber), diaphragm blades 7 (instead of 9) and nut maf very entry level (could cure most of this aspect). Opinion: Optics has excellent color rendition is wonderful and stra even sharper at RT. Very good against the light. taken to replace the heavy Samyang 35mm 1.4 I have to say that as yield and sharpness has nothing to envy, and in addition is AF. I had also considered the Sigma 35mm 1.4 art, but I gave up because of the difference in weight (similar to Sammy) and the euro more to spend. Do not be fooled by the plastic construction, the lens is sturdy and solid. The lack of 1,4 does not feel, considering the high ISO performance of today's DSLR. It would have been a must-have if he had the 9-blade diaphragm. sent on June 01, 2014 |
 | Nikon AF-S DX 35mm f/1.8 G Pros: excellent sharpness even at room temperature, lightness and versatility. Cons: Construction not flawless, blurred not great, sometimes some difficulties with the maf (slow and noisy). Opinion: First drive that made me fall in love with this fantastic focal point. I've had it for over 2 years and I've taken more than 14000 times. performance and sharpness are very good even at room temperature. Lightweight and versatile, it happens sometimes (one of 4) you tube the MAF and especially embarks dust, no effect on the final result, but gives you a lot of boxes. (Among reflex lenses of the past and today, including Sigma, Tamron and Samyang is the first time) sent on March 10, 2013 |
 | Samyang 35mm f/1.4 AS UMC Pros: Great monolith, excellent construction gives a solid feel monstrous. Sharpness already at RT considerable. It is also compatible with many of the old f-mount analog. Cons: First, the case, I'd just put it in Samyang would avoid. Maybe a little pesantuccio (also nikkor 1.4 xo no joke). The lack of AF do not think is a big problem, as long as you take me chippata version. Some problems with the infinity working under f 3.5. Opinion: Always faithful to this focal length I decided to evolve from nikkor 35mm 1.8 g to this. Great buy. I think it's a knife, perfect for portraits, exploited almost like a macro in some cases. Some problems with the focus to infinity. In summary I think as a lens to be understood, and there is some time to get used to it. Either you love it or you hate it, I find I have to take fantastica.rnSe hurry xke now FOWA which will distribute them to raise prices sent on February 08, 2013 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
