RCE Foto

(i) On JuzaPhoto, please disable adblockers (let's see why!)






Login LogoutJoin JuzaPhoto!
JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.


OK, I confirm


You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept CookiesCustomizeRefuse Cookies

Marcox65
www.juzaphoto.com/p/Marcox65



Reviews of cameras, lenses, tripods, heads and other accessories written by Marcox65


Microsoft Translator  The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator.

hasselblad_h5d50Hasselblad H5D-50

Pros: H5D 50C - very high quality pictures with natural colors and no visible noise even at high ISO with the new CMOS sensor, operating speed, ergonomics and robustness of the machine, although not excellent lenses Zeiss

Cons: tropicalization lack, lack of some key direct function in the spine, weight a little high but still well balanced, the price still high

Opinion: I state that I was able to try this fantastic new HASSELBLAD H5D 50C thanks to the kindness and helpfulness of the "mythical" Watanabe in his store that housed the distributor DGTales that had brought machines and backs as to try to clienti.rnrnAnzi I was just interested to try only the new CFV 50C on my old 503 CX to see how the shots were made by the new digital Sony CMOS sensor with Zeiss CF.rnMa then I realized the hard work of using a digital back on the CX 503 and which is ( in my opinion) for those who work only in the studio, while I the Hasselblad - thanks to the great maneuverability and its lightness - I've always worked with great satisfaction even outdoors hand libera.rnE then the biggest problem is that they are lacking true wide-angle 1.5x seen the crop of that then increases all our dear Zeiss lenses until they become almost like paintings such as the normal 80mm becomes 120mm.rnE then woe to not use it (as I unfortunately did) together with the slide was madeoco with bezels for the new format 4,4x3,3 ... a disaster hit the shot, but fortunately I was told that is sold with the back digitale.rnUn'altra thing that has changed (dramatically would say) by sensor smaller than 6x6, is the depth of field that is much more similar to that of the DSLR and in fact because of the rectangular format has missed the last feeling with the legendary Hasselblad (and indeed many continue to use them with the film for these reasons) .rnrnQuindi I wanted to try to see if at least the speed of use with the new H5D 50C was more than just the back mounted on my CX 503, while the quality should not change anything because the sensor is stesso.rnrnIntanto the good news for owners of Zeiss CF: optionally exist original adapter for Hasselblad mount our loved ones on the new Zeiss H5D 50C and I have to say it works very well, of course you have to manually reload the shutter, but is expected una convenient lever alongside dell'adattatore.rnPoi course no problem to display the correct frame in the viewfinder and especially the quality of the shots is fantastic that we were used to with film; Highly recommended to those who have only a couple of optical CF.rnrnCome goes so H5D 50C? Well very well! RNLA shooting speed is very high, the autofocus works well (of course do not expect speed type Ultrasonic Canon) and autofocus sensors can identify what they have always focheggiare.rnIl menu of the digital back is the same CFV very simple to use, lacking, in my opinion, a dedicated button to view the shots and quickly delete those not piacciono.rnLa machine reacts quickly to shoot and you can shoot continuously without sending the sensor in crisis thanks to the buffer of the appropriate size to large files generati.rnDopo shooing back generates a sound that notifies you if the same is done correctly according to the factory settings, and generates a different one ifshould not be so. Of course it is immediately generated histogram of the picture so check if you are on the road giusta.rnL'esposimetro works well and is able to overcome most of the situations with the normal mode prevalence centrale.rnNotevole and really functional shooting mode remotely using an iPhone / iPad that wanting is also quickly sent the photos made (despite the great weight of the photo file came within seconds) .rnL'ho proven even with studio flash and thanks to the built-in wireless communication is always sicura.rnNaturalmente weight but there is a practical use feels less than expected thanks to the great balancing machine / obiettivo.rnrnUnico large mole by all accounts is the lack of weather sealing machine and objectives: if you work in external and should rain, actually a bit of apprehension is seen that you have in hand eurozzi 25,000, while a more "trivial" Nikon or Canon 2000 euro is assured that3B machine helps a lot having been designed for convenient use in verticale.rnrnInserisco also a photo taken at a model with 28 / f4 so that you can see the quality of the new H5D 50C with its optical HCD course I reduced in Photoshop the size of the file that was less than 146 Mb (from RAW 3FR No Interpolation you can generate a TIFF 300 dpi 50x70 cm !!). rnrnPer me absolutely recommended evolved to a professional who works in the studio or outdoors and maybe he already in the house of the optics Hasselblad Zeiss.rn

sent on April 20, 2015


canon_tse90Canon TS-E 90mm f/2.8

Pros: RESOLUTION IN FF; IRIS PRECISION; TOTAL ABSENCE OF DISTORTION; TILT & SHIFT ALMOST FROM OPTICAL BENCH; PRICE BALANCED FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

Cons: DIMENSIONS GREATER THAN A NORMAL OBJECTIVE penalize IN CASE OF STUDY WORK OUT ... BUT WAS NOT BORN TO THIS, AND THAT ONLY 'hard to let it AFTER USED!

Opinion: When I was working in film in the studio I used a Mamiya RB67, then I switched to the world with the fantastic Hasselblad Zeiss lenses, but when it started the digital age that I had to do to work in the studio? rnPrendere an expensive back for Hasseblad? Or improve the park of my Canon lenses? rnPoi one day a colleague had me try the 90 TS-E and ... wow ... well damn I could do without the medium format (usually with the 90 TS-E I make two shots of the same object by moving only the decentralization of 'goal, then join all in Photoshop getting twice the resolution of the camera sensor) and photographed in studio with the Canon without regret Slide made with the quality of the Hasselblad.rnrnCONSIGLIATISSIMOrnrnps: Room Service technician also told me that new ob. Canon TS were improved as the quality of the lenses (see the 24 TS-E II) while regarding the mechanisms were better (more robust) than those of the old version as this 90 TS-E

sent on September 21, 2014




 ^

JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.

Mobile Version - juza.ea@gmail.com - Terms of use and Privacy - Cookie Preferences - P. IVA 01501900334 - REA 167997- PEC juzaphoto@pec.it

May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me