|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Ted www.juzaphoto.com/p/Ted  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge Pros: Fluidity, autonomy, look, camera quality, display Cons: Hard to find ... I would say sensor in 4/3 format and Samsung. The jpg in automatic products are too pumped, contrasted, with saturated colors and therefore unnatural. Opinion: Limiting myself almost exclusively to the photographic sector, I consider this phone really great. Review made after several months of intensive use. RnIn good light conditions, taking rigorously in raw (dng), and taking care of file processing at a minimum, the quality you get is exceptional. To the point that it is often easy to imagine and leave the reflex at home. Personally, I find the brutal branded writings there, in front. I think they take away the beauty and essence of a phone that would otherwise be wonderful.rn I still do not like 4/3. When a cell phone in 3/2? RnOut the autonomy. I came from S6, and the step forward was enormous. Almost impossible not to arrive at the end of the day. RnrnPiccola next integration: I consider the fingerprint reader discreet, but nothing more. I've tried some other brand phones and they certainly work better. sent on June 25, 2017 |
 | Sigma 50mm f/1.4 EX DG HSM Pros: Resolution already at room temperature (when "it happens"), bokeh. Cons: Basically unusable for problems, apparently intractable, focus. Opinion: Very bad experience with this lens. To this day I find myself, after 2 and a half years of fruitless attempts at having to give up. Just purchased, after 4 days I I note the defects (in focusing on canon), I ask the seller to exercise the right of withdrawal (so that they can get a new copy) that denies me brilliantly. An early intervention through his shop, in fact useless. A second sigma, still under warranty, not decisive. The last 2 weeks ago, well-paying € 100 to get it back just a little 'better but still unusable. Has a discordant behavior in both the frequency with which it puts in focus as regards both the front / back focus. If you correct the defect to close it's gonna to infinity and vice versa. rnAnche reading on the net too many problems on Canon, therefore sconsigliatissimo. And Sigma definitely will not take a penny from me. sent on March 09, 2014 |
 | Canon 5D Mark III Pros: Quality and workability of Raw, ergonomics, ease of use (location and menu buttons), versatility, dual-slot, operating speed, AF system, external af points, made at high ISO, rear display, silent shutter, customization possibilities. Cons: Vertical banding, recovery and cleaning of the shadows closed sincroflash speed, dynamic range, lack of the possibility to compensate the exposure in manual mode and auto iso. Opinion: It 's my first full frame camera and I come from a Canon 600D. The beauty of the files that churns out is impressive. It 'a very complete and extremely versatile machine. The leap in quality, once opened the first raw, it is so that makes it more acceptable to the net outlay of money. Even without being an expert you will quickly learn to use it in all of its functions. The raw is workable and even after strong "push-pull" always keeps a beautiful naturalezza.rnIl AF system is up to expectations, very accurate, fast and reliable. The location of the points of focus, with 41 cross-type points, allows you to not have to rebuild every time and is very comfortable. In the street as I understand it very useful for not getting centered on compositions which have to operate in post compositivi.rnLa with crop yield at high ISO is excellent. Provided it is well exposed and not cropped a photo is often used even at ISO 12800, and in any case up to almost 6400 you can forget the noise problem. The yield at high iso is cOSI good as manual and auto iso (for example, range 100-6400), you have total control over shooting parameters, in a very fast and uncompromising quality. The operating speed is really good, I never had lag irritating and there is never a wait. With a proper CF also the download speed of the buffer is very buona.rnDiversamente by many that I like the dual slot provides for a SD and CF not two, being the SD format is very widespread, for example, for "emergencies" travel . The shot noise is almost imperceptible and in certain situations (eg. Churches, theaters, exhibitions, etc) is very utile.rnIl real sore point (I wonder how someone here, too, can be said to the contrary) is the vertical banding, which appears when you attempt to open shadows very closed. In scenes with large differences in brightness, and when there is time for a double exposure, you are forced not to touch the shadows very closed and this, in some cases, egr &ave; penalizing. Compared to the new Exmor sensors (D600 and D800) here the 5D III is a nice head and shoulders below, as well as with respect to the dynamic range, which unfortunately has not been improved compared to the model precedente.rnL 'meter seems very "conservative" and attentive to do not burn the highlights, so at first you have to take a little 'hands. I often make one or two thirds of stop.rnNel complex it seems to me a very good car. Not perfect but, to quote Kai of DigitalRev, very close to perfection. A day will come the new firmware that will make the 5D III still migliore.rn sent on April 25, 2013 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
