|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Fobya71 www.juzaphoto.com/p/Fobya71  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Canon EOS R7 Pros: On paper many compared to my 7D2 Cons: In reality, many features are simply not as they are portrayed Opinion: For me it was the first ML, I sell from 7D2 and 5DSR that I still have and that I still use. I'm talking about the photo part, because I don't make videos and frankly if I wanted to make videos I would use a video camera. I note that I used EF lenses with adapter: 100-400 mKII, 24-70 2.8, 100 macro 2.8 and an old 500 F. R7 had been indicated as a replacement (at least as a intended use) of the legendary and widely used 7D mark II. Frankly, it seems to me more like a replacement for a 70D or 80D. Shooting framerates that gave me the impression of not being the ones declared. I don't know what the cause is, but sometimes they seemed to be slower than on my 7D2... Obviously there is the well-known problem of rolling shutter which in fact affects the possibility of using the maximum shooting FPS with electronic shutter: If you declare a function, it must not have limitations. Frankly ridiculous image buffer, considering the theoretical acquisition frequency. 93 images are nothing when Nikon's competition guarantees a thousand. For some reason, the lens stabilizer remains active all the time. On my DSLRs it disables after a few seconds of releasing the shutter button the last time. I don't understand why on R7 they keep it on all the time. For me it is a software design error. Obviously, the always-on stabilizer produces greater and unnecessary consumption. Chaotic on-screen touch control management. I mean those that can be called up with the info button. I got lost in it several times... When I do birdlife I often keep the automatic isos. For some strange reason (but it's probably me who touches inside some commands without realizing it) the camera went to iso 100 by itself: points, shots at a glance and you find yourself a dark image. I didn't mind the arrangement of the controls that I set so that I have on the speed and aperture rings (standard) and on the adapter ring the ISO. Certainly the low weight compared to my 7D2 is a plus and I had no problem holding it. I had a lot of difficulty bringing home useful shots. I was probably biased or it's me who doesn't know how to use that machine or ML in general, but as I got it I gave it away. Let's see if and when the R7 mark II comes out, or if they will throw out a machine that really has a professional level. The personal feeling is that Canon's entire ML series is made to get you the R5. On DSLRs there was clearly a vastness of better choice. sent on May 15, 2025 |
 | Canon 5Ds R Pros: Megapix, detail Cons: Slow burst (but suitable for its use), lack of an internal flash trigger Opinion: I already had a 7D markII and I was aiming for the 5D IV. Then almost by chance I came across the reviews of this one, I saw the sample photos, and I said "WOW". Considering that in some terms it is the exact opposite of the 7D II, I took it and I like it a lot. I have an amateur use, but for photos where you need to bring out detail is fantastic, of course with the limitations of the case. sent on April 14, 2025 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
