|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Mahatma63 www.juzaphoto.com/p/Mahatma63  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Leica SL2 Pros: Construction, IBIS, Menu, Scope, Ergonomics Cons: Weight, available range still relatively limited, despite L-Mount Alliance, cost Opinion: Moving from SL to SL2 I didn't think it was that rewarding. The IQ is greatly improved, as well as usability in general. It's not a nerd machine or engineers, it's a camera designed by photographers for photographers, no frills. Impressive build quality (take over a Sony and then this... you'll understand what I mean.) Stratospheric sight. The menus are very simple and intuitive (light years ahead of Nikon and Sony). Holding it is a joy. Autofocus maybe can be improved, but cmq great if extreme use is not required. sent on February 19, 2020 |
 | Samyang MF 14mm f/2.8 RF/Z Pros: Good definition, great construction, solid Cons: Distortion, you cannot use screw filters. Lack of AF Opinion: Satisfied. Unbeatable value for money. It should be used carefully to limit situations where distortion can be emphasized. Excellent definition especially in the center and, closing a little the diaphragm, even at the edges, even without excelling. The construction is excellent, gives idea of robustness and solidity. Personally I love the diaphragm diaphragm diaphragm diaphragm diaphragm diaphragm (now disappeared on all modern optics). sent on July 15, 2019 |
 | Sony A7r Pros: Size, quality, stratospheric sensor dynamic range to scream, noise content (but not exciting). Cons: AF limit of sufficiency, poor equipment (user manual, lack of external charger), battery life poor Opinion: I went back to the mythical 36MP Sony sensor, having owned the D800E years ago and after selling the kit Fuji mirrorless. rnL'impressione is upsetting based on use with Zeiss 35mm f/2.8. I made comparisons with Canon lenses in my possession (currently use a 5DMK3) and 24-70 @ 35mm f/2.8 II it is losing out, this is to give an idea of ??the value of this oggetto.rnHo then performed a test with the Zeiss 15mm f/2.8 lens with Metabones adapter III and the results speak for themselves: the same lens used on 5DMK3 does not give the same results. I believe that there is a wide-angle lens on the market just as spectacular, then on A7r really gives the best of sé.rnLa richness of detail and image in general is a pure enjoyment. I found out, and I provide this information for the benefit of the friends of Juza, the RAW processor I've always used (Capture One Pro 7), does not read RAW files at the same level as the SW supplied by Sony. This SW is a nail in terms of performance (even on the MacBook PRO performance chand usually use), but I think the end results will give ragione.rnE 'a surprise, but invite you to do the tests. ACR in my opinion is still low focal peggiore.rnA I have not encountered problems due to vibration down meccanica.rnLa battery life make it obligatory to have (at least) a spare.rnrn sent on July 04, 2014 |
 | Fujifilm XF 14mm f/2.8 R Pros: Compact (for lens type), high performance in terms of sharpness and contrast, even at full aperture. Cons: We must be careful with the ring that allows the transition from AF to manual mode and can easily switch to manual mode, especially if you hold the camera in a backpack where it can rub on the bulkhead. Opinion: A real surprise. RNLA lens construction is of good quality, without affecting the overall weight remains in areas more than human (especially for those who want to travel "light", but without getting to compromise on quality). rnHo performed comparative tests with my very reliable Nikon 14-24 of D800E and I must say that the 14mm Fuji no way disfigured. From now on I will have serious doubts about which lens to travel with! sent on February 06, 2013 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
