|
Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Fabrix www.juzaphoto.com/p/Fabrix ![]() |
![]() | Mitakon 20mm f/2 4.5X Super Macro Pros: good optical yield, cost Cons: constructive precision.very low focusing distance (but this who buys it must know a priori) Opinion: the use of this lens is very similar to that of a normal microscope lens adapted to the camera. The minimum focusing distance makes it difficult to light the subject. My specimen (with canon-ef mount) has a very bad coupling to the bayonet, so much so that you can not in any way reach the shot that would block the lens (and this applies to the three different Canon bodies on which I tried to adapt it), defect that is minimized using cheap manual adapters to other attacks (sony-e - Micro 4/3), evidently the latter have much wider constructive tolerances and allow a better adaptation. Curious thing the blades of the diaphragm are only three, even if the thing in practice does not involve defects in the quality of image that remains very good, comparable to competitors with a much higher price. The use of this lens, however, remains confined to subjects that allow shooting in focus stacking given the very shallow depth of field. I recommend it to those who want to take their first steps in macro photography pushed and do not want to faint, and is still willing to accept compromises on the practicality of use. sent on August 30, 2021 |
![]() | Pentax SMC DA 35mm f/2.4 AL Pros: Lightness, sharpness Cons: plastic bayonet Opinion: Goal underestimated, at least as far as the results it offers. It makes the best of itself on the k1's FF sensor, which covers perfectly even if it is sold for apsc. If you find a cheap one in the second-hand market take it without hesitation. The cons reported in the previous opinions are all real , but they go into the background if you take into account the results according to the cost sent on July 20, 2021 |
![]() | Fujifilm X30 Pros: quality 'constructive, ease' of use, portability ', incredible quality' image compared to the sensor size, remote control, tilt the screen, excellent optics Cons: perhaps the battery life that is not the best Opinion: I state that I received, not by choice, but the wonder that I had from the first use has meant that it has become like a prosthesis that I can not separate myself. Sure to be seen and used for what it is, do not demand performance from FF in the high yield iso.Abbinatela a Manfrotto Pixi and you'll have the ultimate in a few hundred grams. Impossible not to fall for her. sent on July 22, 2016 |
![]() | Nikkor 85mm f/2 AI Pros: solid construction, sharpness, focal perfect for portraits. Although it is relatively light and compact mechanically definitely belongs to the best set of objectives built by Nikon Cons: no one is used to the one for which it was designed Opinion: I own this perspective for decades, has been a faithful companion since the days of the legendary Nikon f, I think it has the best performance in f2 than the more 'modern F1.8 af, although globally diaphragm more' closed it is exceeded. It is not widespread because already 'at the time was to compete with its unbeatable partner 105 / 2,5.rnChe say, if you find one in good working condition and at a fair price make it your own, you will not regret sent on September 17, 2015 |
May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me